The new world [dis] order in the complexity of multi‐polarity: United States of America's hegemonic decline and the configuration of new power patterns

Published date01 February 2021
AuthorMakhura Benjamin Rapanyane
Date01 February 2021
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2114
ACADEMIC PAPER
The new world [dis] order in the complexity of multi-polarity:
United States of America's hegemonic decline and the
configuration of new power patterns
Makhura Benjamin Rapanyane
School of Social Sciences, University of
Limpopo, Polokwane, South Africa
Correspondence
Makhura Benjamin Rapanyane, School of
Social Sciences, University of Limpopo,
South Africa.
Email: Makhurabenjamin2@gmail.com
[Correction added on 04 May 2020, after first
online publication: The author's name was
incorrectly rendered in the original version of
the article. This version corrects the error.]
History tells us that the United States of America (US)'s hegemonic predomination
materialized from a very long-ideological battle and/ Cold War, sometimes referred
to as the war of words lasted for about five decades from the mid-1940s to 1989,
and consequently stopped after the fragmentation of the Soviet Union Empire. Thus,
in contemporary times, it is lamentably regrettable that USA has come to face oligop-
olistic challenge in the context of both political and economic dominion. The interna-
tional system is slowly but surely experiencing the emergence of brand new political
and economic power patterns vis-à-vis China, European Union (EU) and Brazil,
Russian, India, China, South Africa (BRICS). In light of the aforementioned, this article
assesses the symptoms of US hegemonic decline and how this helps shape the cur-
rent global academic and/ scholarly debates on the strategic environment. Equally
important is the adoption and application of Afrocentricity as the theoretical frame-
work in the quest for relocation from the knowledge production marginsand the
spirit of the anticipation of the DE-colonial Political contemplation in South Africa's
life-time. As a theory, it is employed to answer the central question: Is it a reality or a
myth that USA's dominion over the international system is coming to an end? Meth-
odologically, this article relied on interdisciplinary discourse analysis and thematic
content prevailing documents.
1|INTRODUCTION
This article as advised by the basic elements of Afrocentricity (to be
outlined in the next section) assesses the US Hegemonic decline in
the period after the Cold War era. The central thread in this article is
to analyze the fundamental challenges to the US global hegemony
and also to explain the symptoms of this hegemonic decline to show
well that US hegemony is coming to an end. In this article, the word,
hegemony is used interchangeably with predomination and dominion
to explain the entire context of this article. Equally important is the
unpacking of the synopsis of the cold war and/ ideological conflict
which resulted in the USA becoming the global hegemon after the
breakup of the Soviet Union Empire in 1989. Thus, the problem state-
ment denoted by this article is that, the USA has been experiencing
fundamental internal and external challenges to its global hegemony.
Hence, making it clear that its economic and political dominion is at
risk, even though it is quite difficult for the USA to come to terms
with it. Therefore, this article comes at a significant time in history
where China, EU and BRICS are going through significant political and
economic developments in the sense that their increasing economic
power is undeniable, as they continuously attract Foreign Direct
Investment (FDI) from the international system. Further, they have at
once shown their strength in the Doha Round by demanding new
leadership in both the World Bank and the International Monetary
Fund. In the future, such instances will be frequent, particularly when
it relates to international agreements to counter US hegemony in the
world. The interlinkage that is found in the presumed US hegemonic
decline is centrally found in the BRICS countries having increased eco-
nomic strength and leverage to communicate their desires and needs
in the international arena.
Received: 8 September 2019 Revised: 7 January 2020 Accepted: 8 March 2020
DOI: 10.1002/pa.2114
J Public Affairs. 2021;21:e2114. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/pa © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 1of7
https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2114

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT