The Neodevelopmentalist Front and Mercosur under the PT Governments: The Rise and Fall of Multidimensional Regionalism

Date01 March 2022
Published date01 March 2022
AuthorTatiana Berringer
DOI10.1177/0094582X211029308
Subject MatterArticles
https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X211029308
LATIN AMERICAN PERSPECTIVES, Issue 243, Vol. 49 No. 2, March 2022, 104–117
DOI: 10.1177/0094582X211029308
© 2021 Latin American Perspectives
104
The Neodevelopmentalist Front and Mercosur
under the PT Governments
The Rise and Fall of Multidimensional Regionalism
by
Tatiana Berringer
An analysis of the relationship between classes and class fractions and Mercosur under
the PT (Workers’ Party) governments suggests that the transition from the open regional-
ism of the 1990s to the multidimensional regionalism of the 2000s and the crisis of the
latter were linked to the overlap between the regional integration mechanisms Unasur and
Mercosur and the social base of the neodevelopmentalist front. Multidimensional region-
alism went into crisis after 2012, when the country began to suffer the impact of the 2008
financial crisis and changes in international politics and when the political process that
culminated in the 2016 coup began.
Uma análise da relação entre as classes e frações de classe e o Mercosul dos governos
PT sugere que a transição do regionalismo aberto dos anos 1990 para o regionalismo mul-
tidimensional dos anos 2000 e a crise deste ultimo estão ligados à imbricação entre os
processos de integração regional, Unasur e Mercosur, e a base social da frente neodesen-
volvimentista. O regionalismo multidimensional entrou em crise a partir de 2012 quando
o país começou a sofrer mais o impacto da crise financeira de 2008 e das transformações
na política internacional e iniciou-se o processo político que culminou no golpe de 2016.
Keywords: Regional integration, Internal bourgeoisie, Neodevelopmentalism, Workers’
Party
During the Partido dos Trabalhadores (Workers’ Party—PT) governments
(2003–2016), regional integration was one of the priorities of the foreign policy
of the Brazilian state. The strategy was based on the consolidation of multidi-
mensional regionalism, which, unlike the open regionalism of the 1990s, cen-
tered on economic issues and trade liberalization, had incorporated commitments
in the areas of defense, infrastructure, development, social policy. and citizen-
ship (Pereira, 2014). However, the Southern Common Market (Mercosur) and
the Union of South American Nations (Unasur) were still configured as inter-
governmental arrangements, with little institutionalization and a limited num-
ber of political commitments determined by the political-ideological position
of the Brazilian internal bourgeoisie, which was the main beneficiary of these
Tatiana Berringer is a lecturer in the graduate program in international relations at the Universidade
Federal do ABC. She is the author of A burguesia brasileira e a política externa nos governos FHC e Lula
(2015) and coauthor (with Armando Boito) of “Social Classes, Neodevelopmentalism, and Foreign
Policy under Presidents Lula and Dilma” (Latin American Perspectives 41 [5]). Luis Fierro is a trans-
lator in the Miami area.
1029308LAPXXX10.1177/0094582X211029308Latin American PerspectivesBerringer / NEODEVELOPMENTALISM AND MERCOSUR UNDER THE PT
research-article2021

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT