The interconnectivity of justice.

AuthorPettis, Eugene K.
PositionPresident's page

Since we were elementary school students, it has been ingrained in us as Americans to embrace the idea of "justice for all." Every time we recite the Pledge of Allegiance and close with the words, "One nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all," we are reminded of this principle.

If we took a poll, an overwhelming majority of people, irrespective of party affiliation, economic class, or religion would say they support fair and impartial courts that are accessible to all.

But what does such an endorsement really mean? Have we as a society become callous to the true meaning of those principles? Individually, do we stand with the same conviction for those principles as our forefathers did, during the founding of this great country, with their recognition that an effective and respected court system was essential to sustain a true democracy?

I pose these questions to pause and reflect on where we stand, individually and as a society, in matching our rhetoric with our deeds. Given such universal support for the idea of justice for all, are we protecting and maintaining our system of justice as the vehicle through which justice flows?

When we speak of our system of justice as the beacon of our democracy, we must understand each citizen's access to our courts is essential. In Florida, our judicial system is designed to ensure fair and impartial courts, representative of all Floridians.

Those component parts include encouraging qualified lawyers and citizens to serve on our judicial nominating commissions, worthy candidates willing to step up for consideration to serve on the bench, and our governor who is tasked with the ultimate selection.

Each step is critical to the end result. If any step fails, it impacts our end result: justice. We must recognize the interconnectivity of justice. If we do not maintain the constitutional systems that create the framework for liberty and justice, we cannot achieve these ideals. The foundation of this promise is our judiciary.

Florida, in 1971, adopted Article V, which created a nonpartisan ballot and a merit selection system as the method of choosing judges. Whenever a judicial vacancy occurs, a slate of at least three (no more than six) qualified nominees is chosen by a JNC--a nonpartisan, nine-member body composed of lay citizens and lawyers. This list of nominees is then submitted to the governor, who fills the vacancy by...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT