The INSPIRE Framework: How Public Administrators Can Increase Compliance with Written Requests Using Behavioral Techniques

Published date01 January 2019
Date01 January 2019
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13004
The INSPIRE Framework: How Public Administrators Can Increase Compliance with Written Requests Using Behavioral Techniques 125
Public Administration Review,
Vol. 79, Iss. 1, pp. 125–135. © 2018 by
The American Society for Public Administration.
DOI: 10.1111/puar.13004.
Peter Bragge is associate professor at
BehaviourWorks Australia, an applied behavioral
research center within the Monash Sustainable
Development Institute. Peter specializes in
healthcare quality improvement by using behavioral
science to aid the translation of research evidence
into practices, systems, and policies. Peter regularly
provides expert healthcare quality improvement
advice to government committees, clinicians. and
healthcare organizations.
E-mail: peter.bragge@monash.edu
Twitter: @BraggePeter
Kim Borg is a research officer and PhD
candidate at BehaviourWorks Australia,
Monash Sustainable Development Institute,
Monash University. Her research experience
lies in the area of social and government
research, where she has worked with a number
of large organizations and departments such
as Australia Post, the Victorian Department of
Health and Human Services, WorkSafe Victoria,
and the Transport Accident Commission.
E-mail: kim.borg@monash.edu
Nicholas Faulkner is research fellow at
BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash Sustainable
Development Institute, Monash University. His
research interests lie primarily in the areas of political
psychology and behavioral public administration.
He regularly consults and works with government
agencies on how to use behavioral science to
promote socially beneficial behaviors.
E-mail: nicholas.faulkner@monash.edu
Twitter: @nickjfaulkner
Nicholas Faulkner
Kim Borg
Peter Bragge
Jim Curtis
Behaviour Works Australia
Eraj Ghafoori
Behaviour Works Australia and Australian Super
Denise Goodwin
Bradley S. Jorgensen
Lena Jungbluth
Sarah Kneebone
Liam Smith
Breanna Wright
Behaviour Works Australia
Paula Wright
Behaviour Works Australia and Victorian Agency for
Health Information
The INSPIRE Framework: How Public Administrators
Can Increase Compliance with Written Requests
Using Behavioral Techniques
Abstract: Public administrators rely on written communications to send information to citizens and stakeholders,
and they are among the heaviest users of the postal service. Behavioral science research has identified several techniques
that public administrators can use to increase compliance with written requests and, in turn, increase effectiveness.
Currently, however, many written communications from government bodies are not written in a manner that utilizes
these techniques. It remains an ongoing challenge for public administrators to identify, understand, and use these
techniques in the written communications sent by their organizations. This article presents a framework capturing
seven prominent techniques in a simple mnemonic—INSPIRE—that is already being used by several government
bodies in Australia. It also provides practical examples of how to use each technique and demonstrates that using
these techniques could result in large aggregate improvements in effectiveness and socially desirable outcomes of public
administrators’ written communications.
Public administrators rely on letters and other
written communications to send information
to citizens and stakeholders. Governments
in most countries continue to be heavy users of
postal services (PwC 2013; Turnbull 2016), and
they are increasingly using digital services to deliver
written communications to citizens, businesses,
and stakeholders (Hassan, Shehab, and Peppard
2011; Titah and Barki 2006). Although many of
these written communications include attempts to
influence behavior (e.g., a request to return specified
information), most letters from public administrators
do not currently use techniques from the applied
behavioral sciences to maximize their impact. If
they did, even small percentage improvement
in compliance could have important aggregate
benefits, given the high volumes of letters, emails,
and other types of written communications sent
by governments (Cialdini, Martin, and Goldstein
2015).
There are many examples in which incorporating
behavioral techniques in written communications
has helped increase public administrators’ impact. To
name just a few, incorporating behavioral techniques
helped U.K. tax authorities collect £5.6 billion more
in overdue revenue in a single financial year (Martin
2012), reduced U.K. doctors’ overprescribing of
antibiotics by 73,406 doses during a six-month trial
(Hallsworth et al. 2016), helped attract more diverse
job applicants (Linos 2018), and encouraged more
people to use online e-government services (Castelo
et al. 2015; Faulkner, Jorgensen, and Koufariotis
2018). Additionally, letters from government are
often criticized for being unclear, cold, and lacking in
empathy (e.g., Faulkner et al. 2018, Wenzel 2006),
which applying behavioral principles may help address.
In recent years, there has been a growing interest
in how psychology and behavioral science can help
public administrators be more effective (Bellé,
Cantarelli, and Belardinelli 2018; Grimmelikhuijsen
et al. 2017; Oliver 2015; Thaler and Sunstein 2009).
Since Thaler and Sunstein’s (2008) influential book
Nudge illustrated how small changes to environments
and policies can help individuals behave in ways that
benefit themselves and others, the amount of research
on applying behavioral techniques in government
contexts has grown substantially.
A vast and growing literature in behavioral sciences
has identified several techniques that can be used in
Viewpoint
Stephen E. Condrey
andTonya Neaves,
Associate Editors
Jim Curtis is a senior research fellow at
BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash Sustainable
Development Institute, Monash University. His research
focuses of understanding and influencing behaviors
that affect achieving positive circular economy,
environmental compliance, and social outcomes.
E-mail: james.curtis@monash.edu

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT