The impact of terrorism on civil servants: Longitudinal evidence from the July 22, 2011 attack in Norway

Published date01 November 2023
AuthorBenny Geys,Per Lægreid,Zuzana Murdoch,Jarle Trondal
Date01 November 2023
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13694
RESEARCH ARTICLE
The impact of terrorism on civil servants: Longitudinal
evidence from the July 22, 2011 attack in Norway
Benny Geys
1
| Per Lægreid
2
| Zuzana Murdoch
2
| Jarle Trondal
3,4
1
Department of Economics, BI Norwegian
Business School, Bergen, Norway
2
Department of Government, University of
Bergen, Bergen, Norway
3
Department of Political Science and
Management, University of Agder, Kristiansand,
Norway
4
ARENA Centre for European Studies, University
of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Correspondence
Benny Geys, Department of Economics, BI
Norwegian Business School, Kong Christian
Frederiks plass 5, 5006 Bergen, Norway.
Email: benny.geys@bi.no
Abstract
Building on a growing literature assessing the societal impact of terrorism, this arti-
cle analyzes whether and how a terror attack targeting public institutions affects
civil servants in their day-to-day work. This is an important question to enhance
our understanding of how terrorism can (or cannot) affect the operation of core
government functions. Theoretically, the study contributes to a broader account of
the political consequences of terrorism by combining insights from social identity
and organization theory. Empirically, we exploit a two-wave survey fielded before
and after the 2011 terror attack in Norway, which allows us to study the same civil
servants (N=186) before and after this event. While terrorists wish to disrupt pub-
lic institutions, our findings indicate that a terror attack targeting core government
institutions strengthens internal cohesion and increases attention to political sig-
nals in work tasks. We discuss implications of these effects for the functioning of
democratic government.
Evidence for Practice
A terror attack directed against the government apparatus can have important
implications for the civil servants located at the epicenter of the attack.
Civil servantssense of belonging to their organization and a tightening of politi-
cal authority are two mechanisms through which terrorism might impact public
governance.
Political leadership may gain influence over civil servantsdecision-making in
the aftermath of an external threat.
This contraction of public authority can potentially reduce civil servantsatten-
tion to bureaucratic leaders and professional principles in their day-to-day work.
INTRODUCTION
How if at all does terrorism targeted at public organi-
zations affect the operation of core government func-
tions? This is an important question from a public
administration and democratic politics perspective since
public organizations and the staff employed within them
play a fundamental role in the governing of modern
societies (Huber, 2000; Orren & Skowronek, 2017;
Putnam, 1973). As such, it is critical to understand
whether and how acute extra-organizational stressors
(Byron & Peterson, 2002, p. 895) such as terrorist attacks
on public organizations affect civil servants during the
execution of their work. Building on a growing literature
assessing the societal impact of terrorism (Berrebi &
Klor, 2008; Breton & Eady, 2022; Huddy et al., 2002; Huddy
et al., 2005), this study combines unique individual-level
longitudinal data with a quasi-experimental empirical
approach to address this question.
There is no single definition of terrorism that com-
mands full international approval (Schmid, 2021). Extant
definitions include objective as well as subjective ele-
ments (Shanahan, 2016) and cover legal, moral, and
behavioral perspectives (Ruby, 2002). In this article, we
study the responses of the victims of acts of terrorism,
such that a behavioral-perceptual understanding of
Received: 13 January 2023 Revised: 18 June 2023 Accepted: 20 June 2023
DOI: 10.1111/puar.13694
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribu tion and reproduction in any medium, provided the
original work is properly cited.
© 2023 The Authors. Public Administration Review published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Public Administration.
1772 Public Admin Rev. 2023;83:17721784.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/puar

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT