The impact of preventive coping on business travelers' work and private life

AuthorTeresa Müller,Sabine Hommelhoff,Cornelia Niessen,Mina Westman
Date01 January 2018
Published date01 January 2018
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/job.2215
RESEARCH ARTICLE
The impact of preventive coping on business travelers' work
and private life
Cornelia Niessen
1
|Teresa Müller
1
|Sabine Hommelhoff
1
|Mina Westman
2
1
Institute of Psychology, Work and
Organizational Psychology, Friedrich
Alexander University of ErlangenNürnberg,
Erlangen, Germany
2
Coller School of Management, Tel Aviv
University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Correspondence
Cornelia Niessen, Institute of Psychology,
FriedrichAlexander University of Erlangen
Nürnberg, Nägelsbachstr. 49c, Erlangen
91052, Germany.
Email: cornelia.niessen@fau.de
Funding information
Lion Foundation, Grant/Award Number:
0612014701
Summary
Frequent business travel can be a burden for travelers' work and private life. We tested whether
preventive coping (the proactive accumulation of resources in advance of potential stressors)
makes such trips beneficial despite their potential to be stressful. In a longitudinal three
wave study, we investigated whether frequent travel relates to an increase or decrease in worklife
balance, emotional exhaustion, work engagement, and relationship satisfaction depending on pre-
ventive coping. Findings from a sample of 133 frequent business travelers revealed significant indi-
rect effects for emotional exhaustion, work engagement, and relationship satisfaction through
worklife balance. Among employees who engaged less in preventive coping, a higher number of
business trips was related to a decrease in worklife balance, which, in turn, was related to more
emotional exhaustion, less work engagement, and lower relationship satisfaction. Among those
who reported higher preventive coping, we found opposing indirect effects: Frequent travel was
related to an increase in worklife balance and, in turn, to less emotional exhaustion, more work
engagement, and higher relationship satisfaction. These findings advance our knowledge in the
field of business travel, futureoriented coping, and worklife balance. They highlight that travelers
and their organizations should resort to preventive coping to make frequent travel more beneficial.
KEYWORDS
exhaustion, preventive coping, relationship satisfaction, work engagement, worklifebalance
1|INTRODUCTION
Due to globalization, business trips have become a common part of
many jobs (DeFrank, Konopaske, & Ivancevich, 2000). Although techno-
logical innovations sometimes render business travel unnecessary,
managers claim that virtual forms of communication can never fully
replace real facetoface discussions and human contact (Ivancevich,
Konopaske, & DeFrank, 2003). Consequently, business trips will
continue to be the main means of negotiating contracts; visiting cus-
tomers, suppliers, or other partners; conducting international trainings;
or attending conferences (e.g., Welch, Welch, & Worm, 2007). Existing
research mainly discusses the potential downsides of frequent business
trips, such as deterioration of performance, worklife balance, and well
being among traveling employees and their families (e.g., DeFrank et al.,
2000; Dennis, 1997; Diamond, Hicks, & OtterHenderson, 2008;
Dimberg et al., 2002; Espino, Sundstrom, Frick, Jacobs, & Peters,
2002; Ivancevich et al., 2003; Jensen, 2014; Liese, Mundt, Dell, Nagy,
& Demure, 1997; Striker, Dimberg, & Liese, 2000; Westman, Etzion, &
Gattenio, 2008). However, some studies have also revealed positive
effects of business trips on travelers (e.g., Mäkelä, Kinnunen, & Suutari,
2015; Oddou, Mendenhall, & Ritchie, 2000; Westman & Etzion, 2002;
Westman, Etzion, & Chen, 2009a,b) such as recovery from work or
learning (Tay, Westman, & Chia, 2008). It seems that business trips are
a dual experience in that they impose demands and generate resources,
leading to losses and gains of resources, with consequences for
performance and wellbeing of travelers and their families.
Business trips are important for both individual careers and orga-
nizational success (DeFrank et al., 2000). For organizations, it is crucial
to know what maximizes positive and minimizes negative aspects of
business travel because employees have to perform well during and
after their trips. Thus, it is in the vital interest of organizations to better
understand how travelers can be supported in making their trips
successful in terms of work, but also in terms of familyrelated out-
comes. When stressful aspects of frequent travel outweigh its
benefits, organizations might even lose skilled workers as they prefer
less stressful jobs with fewer negative consequences for their well
being and the workfamily interface. Thus, to understand the impact
of frequent travel on employees, it is of fundamental importance to
Received: 16 September 2016 Revised: 25 June 2017 Accepted: 7 July 2017
DOI: 10.1002/job.2215
J Organ Behav. 2018;39:113127. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/job 113

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT