The impact of clean energy consumption on economic growth and CO2 emissions in BRICS countries: Does the environmental Kuznets curve exist?

Published date01 February 2021
AuthorMallesh Ummalla,Phanindra Goyari
Date01 February 2021
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2126
ACADEMIC PAPER
The impact of clean energy consumption on economic
growth and CO
2
emissions in BRICS countries: Does
the environmental Kuznets curve exist?
Mallesh Ummalla | Phanindra Goyari
School of Economics, University of Hyderabad,
Hyderabad, India
Correspondence
Mallesh Ummalla, School of Economics,
University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad 500046,
India.
Email: mummalla@uohyd.ac.in
This paper examines the impact of clean energy consumption (CEC) on economic
growth (EG) and CO
2
emissions (CO
2
) within a framework of environmental Kuznets
curve (EKC) hypothesis in a panel of BRICS countries for the period 19922014. The
results indicated that CEC and EG have a significant positive impact on EG, while
CO
2
has a negative impact on it. Our results also found that EC and EG increase CO
2
while CEC significantly reduces it. Further, we found that the EKC hypothesis is valid
in the BRICS countries. Finally, panel causality test indicated that unidirectional cau-
sality running from EC to EG. However, we did not find a causal relationship between
CEC and EG. Based on these results, some of the policy implications have proposed
for these emerging market economies.
1|INTRODUCTION
Energy consumptio n (EC) is a towe ring funct ioning fact or of eco-
nomic growth (EG) along with capital and labor for any nation as
they are inputs in the production of goods and services. Every stage
of economic activities, from production to consumption, the county
largely relies on energy. Therefore, energy is the main driving force
of economic growth (EG) and industrialization. However, high EC
increases higher CO
2
emissions (CO
2
). According to the World
Bank (2019), the world gross domestic product (GDP) has increased
significantly, approximately two times, from $39,170.1 billion (con-
stant 2010 US$) in 1992 to $73,690.3 billion in 2014, with an aver-
ageannualgrowthrateof2.9%.Atthesametime,globalEChas
increased from 8,223.6 million tonnes oil equivalent (Mtoe) in 1992
to 12,939.7 Mtoe in 2014, with an average annual growth rate of
2.0%. The massive combustion for energy, especially conventional
energy sources, led to environmental issues. Therefore, global CO
2
has increased from 21,354.0 million tons (Mt) in 1992 to 32,844.8
Mt in 2014 (BP, 2018). In search of alternatives to carbon-intensive
fossil fuel, clean energy use has the considerable most effective
source of energy in the world.
Therefore, interna tional or ganizat ions, eco nomists , environ -
mental scientists, and policymakers are alarming the developed
and developing countries to shift their EC patterns from nonclean
to clean energy sources. In order to reduce CO
2
and control global
warming, the demand for clean energy has been increasing in the
world. The clean energy consumption (CEC) has many benefits
over nonclean energy sources. First, it is noncarbohydrate energy
that does not emit CO
2
when generated. Second, clean energy can
be widely used in both domestic (solar energy) and industrial sec-
tor. Third, development of clean energy projects in rural areas also
fills the gap between ruralurban energy in terms of accessible,
reliable, and affordable. Fourth, generation of clean energy will
reduce the dependence of imported nonclean energies, that is, oil,
gas, and coal, and so on. It will stabilize the macroeconomic perfor-
mance of the economy. Finally, installation of clean energy pro-
jects will create job opportunities directly or directly in the
economy.
The BRICS countries have accounted for 20.3% of the world
GDP, 36.7% of global EC, and contributed 41.9% of global CO
2
in
2014. The fact is that the significant development of clean energy
needed; otherwise, these countries will be struck into the insecure,
inefficient, and carbon-intensive energy system. To overcome this,
the BRICS countries have been heavily investing in clean energy pro-
jects. Pao, Li, and Hsin-Chia (2014) also suggested the development
of clean energy is a feasible solution for addressing energy security
and climate change issues. In 2014, Brazil's CEC accounted for 10.8%
of total energy use, Russia's was 8.1%, India's was 2.6%, China's was
Received: 23 December 2019 Revised: 30 January 2020 Accepted: 9 March 2020
DOI: 10.1002/pa.2126
J Public Affairs. 2021;21:e2126. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/pa © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 1of12
https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2126

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT