The Global Survey of Public Servants: Evidence from 1,300,000 Public Servants in 1,300 Government Institutions in 23 Countries

Published date01 July 2023
AuthorChristian Schuster,Kim Sass Mikkelsen,Daniel Rogger,Francis Fukuyama,Zahid Hasnain,Dinsha Mistree,Jan Meyer‐Sahling,Katherine Bersch,Kerenssa Kay
Date01 July 2023
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13611
VIEWPOINT ARTICLE
The Global Survey of Public Servants: Evidence from 1,300,000
Public Servants in 1,300 Government Institutions in 23 Countries
Christian Schuster
1
|Kim Sass Mikkelsen
2
|Daniel Rogger
3
|
Francis Fukuyama
4
|Zahid Hasnain
3
|Dinsha Mistree
5
|Jan Meyer-Sahling
6
|
Katherine Bersch
7
|Kerenssa Kay
3
1
School of Public Policy, University College
London, London, UK
2
Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark
3
World Bank, Washington, DC, USA
4
Freeman Spogli Institute for International
Studies, Stanford University, Stanford,
California, USA
5
Hoover Institution and Law School, Stanford
University, Stanford, California, USA
6
University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
7
Davidson College, Davidson, North
Carolina, USA
Correspondence
Daniel Rogger, World Bank, Washington, DC,
USA.
Email: drogger@worldbank.org
Abstract
Understanding how public administrations around the world function and differ is
crucial for strengthening their effectiveness. Most comparative measures of bureau-
cracy rely on surveys of experts, households, or firms, rather than directly question-
ing bureaucrats.Direct surveys of public officials create granular data for analysis
and government action, so are becoming a cornerstone of public sector manage-
ment. This article introduces the Global Survey of Public Servants (GSPS), a global
initiative to collect and harmonize large-scale, comparable survey data on public ser-
vants. The corresponding GSPS data set currently contains responses from 1,300,000
+bureaucrats in 1,300+government institutions in 23 countries. The surveys mea-
sure both employee attitudes (such as job satisfaction and motivation), and their
experience with management practices (such as recruitment and performance man-
agement). This harmonized data enables governments to benchmark themselves
and scholars to study comparative publicadministration and the state differently,
based on micro-data fromactors who experience government first-hand.
Evidence for practice
As a step towards strengthened availability of harmonized but granular data on
public administration around the world, the Global Survey of Public Servants
(GSPS) brings together surveys based on responses from over 1,300,000 public
servants in over 1,300 government institutions in 23 countries. The intention of
the GSPS is to encourage further surveying of public officials, in a consistent way
where possible, and the sharing of that survey data for the benefit of researchers
and public sector managers around the world.
By implementing the Global Survey of Public Servants core module, govern-
ments can generate comparable data on their public service. This facilitates the
benchmarking of units, organizations, and the service as a whole to international
comparators in key management practices and employee attitudes, such as job
satisfaction or work motivation.
The Global Survey of Public Servants also enables governments to compare the
methodological choices they have made in their survey approach toother surveys
and better appreciate the trade-offs of those choices.As such, the GSPS hopes to
strengthen the quality of public servant survey data, and in turn the understand-
ing of strategic areas for development inside public administration. By improving
the quality of benchmarks across different institutions inside government and
across different groups of public servants (e.g., comparing public servants of differ-
ent gender or ranks), governments capacity to strengthen itself is improved.
Received: 19 September 2022Revised: 18 January 2023Accepted: 26 January 2023
DOI: 10.1111/puar.13611
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permitsuse, distribution and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
© 2023 The Authors. Public Administration Review published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Public Administration.
982 Public Admin Rev. 2023;83:982993.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/puar

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT