The Fiscal Burden of Wildfires: State Expenditures and Funding Mechanisms for Wildfire Suppression in the Western U.S. and Implications for Federal Policy

Published date01 December 2021
AuthorPhilip S. Cook,Chelsea Pennick McIver,Dennis R. Becker
DOI10.1177/0160323X211061353
Date01 December 2021
Subject MatterField Notes
The Fiscal Burden of Wildres:
State Expenditures and Funding
Mechanisms for Wildre
Suppression in the Western U.S.
and Implications for Federal
Policy
Chelsea Pennick McIver
1
, Philip S. Cook
1
,
and Dennis R. Becker
2
Executive Summary
The number and size of wildres in the western United States have increased dramatically in the last
30 years. The rising cost of wildre suppression has become a signicant concern for all levels of
government, although most attention has been focused on the federal level. Much less is known
about the nancial impact of expenditures on states, which retain responsibility for suppression
on over 480 million acres of state and private forests. This study collected data on state expendi-
tures for wildre suppression in the western United States from 2005 to 2015 to examine scal
burdens and compare funding mechanisms used to cover those costs. Our analysis nds that west-
ern states expended $11.9 billion on wildre suppression over the 11-year period and used own-
source funds to cover 88 percent of these costs. States displayed a variety of mechanisms for cov-
ering their cost obligations with tradeoffs that may affect non-wildre policy priorities.
Keywords
natural disasters, public nance, states, wildre, policy
Introduction
The number of large wildres and areas burned
by wildres each year in the western United
States has increased signicantly over the last
30 years (Westerling 2016; Hoover and
Hanson 2021). This trend is expected to con-
tinue, even in areas historically characterized
by long re return intervals (Liu and
Wimberly 2016; McEvoy et al. 2020). Costs
associated with wildres, including loss of life
and property, have been signicant (Thomas
et al. 2017), and the nancial burden to
federal agencies continue to escalate (Hoover
2020; Burke et al. 2021).
1
Policy Analysis Group, College of Natural Resources,
University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
2
College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho,
Moscow, ID, USA
Corresponding Author:
Chelsea Pennick McIver, Policy Analysis Group, College of
Natural Resources, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Dr.
MS 1139, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.
Email: cpmciver@uidaho.edu
Field Notes
State and Local Government Review
2021, Vol. 53(4) 337-351
© The Author(s) 2021
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/0160323X211061353
journals.sagepub.com/home/slg

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT