The Evolution of Income Composition Inequality in Italy, 1989–2016

Published date01 March 2023
AuthorRoberto Iacono,Marco Ranaldi
Date01 March 2023
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12555
© 2021 The Authors. Review of Income and Wealth published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of
International Association for Research in Income and Wealth
124
THE EVOLUTION OF INCOME COMPOSITION INEQUALITY IN ITALY,
1989– 2016
by RobeRto Iacono*
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), University of South- Eastern Norway (USN)
AND
MaRco RanaldI
University College London, Stone Center on Socio- Economic Inequality, The Graduate Center, CUNY
We study the evolution of inequality in income composition in terms of capital and labor income in
Italy between 1989 and 2016. We document a rise in the share of capital income accruing to the bottom
of the distribution, while the top of the distribution increases its share of labor income. This implies
a falling degree of income composition inequality in the period considered and a weaker relationship
between the functional and personal distribution of income in Italy. This result is robust to various
specifications of self- employment income; nonetheless, it hinges crucially on the treatment of rental
incomes. While the dynamics of imputed rents has brought about a more equitable distribution of
capital incomes across the income distribution, that of actual rents has led to higher concentration
of capital incomes at the top in the decade preceding the outbreak of the financial crisis. Finally, we
conceptualize a rule of thumb for policy makers seeking to reduce income inequality in the long run.
JEL Codes: D31, D33, D63, E25
Keywords: income composition inequality, functional and personal income distributions, Italy
1. IntRoductIon
In recent years, the dynamics of factor income shares and its potential effect
on the level of personal income inequality has attracted considerable attention by
economic scholars (Atkinson, 2009; Glyn, 2011; Piketty and Zucman, 2014). The
documented rise of the capital income share in many advanced economies (Piketty
and Zucman, 2014) has strengthened such debate. As Atkinson (2009) suggests,
one of the main reasons to study factor shares is to establish a link between incomes
at the macroeconomic level (national accounts) and incomes at the level of the house-
hold (p. 5).
Note: We thank the editor in charge of this submission, four anonymous reviewers, F. Bloise,
A. Brandolini, E. Felice, B. Milanovic, S. Morelli, E. Palagi, F. Patriarca, M. Raitano, A. Roventini,
F. Saraceno, E. Stockhammer, participants at the 8th ECINEQ Meeting of the Society for the Study of
Economic Inequality held at the Paris School of Economics (PSE), and participants at the 60th annual
conference of the Italian Economic Association held at the University of Palermo for their helpful
comments and suggestions.
*Correspondence to: Roberto Iacono, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU),
University of South- Eastern Norway (USN), Campus Tunga, Tungasletta 2, NO- 7491 Trondheim,
Norway (roberto.iacono@ntnu.no).
Review of Income and Wealth
Series 69, Number 1, March 2023
DOI: 10.1111/roiw.12555
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri butio n- NonCo mmerc ial-
NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is
properly cited, the use is non- commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
bs_bs_banner
Review of Income and Wealth, Series 69, Number 1, March 2023
125
© 2021 The Authors. Review of Income and Wealth published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of
International Association for Research in Income and Wealth
The literature on the topic is, however, far from reaching a consensus on the
shape of the relationship between the functional and personal income distribu-
tions. Bengtsson and Waldenström (2018) show that the link between the dynamics
of the capital share and that of income inequality does not need to be constant
over time and across countries. This link can be contingent on the production tech-
nology, the structure of personal incomes or the institutional context, all of which
may— and do indeed— change over time (p. 713). The objective of this paper is to
investigate this link, focusing on the case of Italy.
In a recent study, Gabbuti (2020) studies the dynamics of the labor share in
Italy between 1895 and 1970 and shows that its link with the evolution of income
inequality varies over time. According to Gabbuti (2020), the Italian case reveals
that factor shares offer great, complementary insights in the historical analysis of
inequality, reflecting fundamental changes in the economy and society (p. 2). To com-
plement and expand such historical analysis, this paper studies this relationship in
Italy over the past three decades. To this end, it focuses on a new inequality dimen-
sion recently introduced by Ranaldi (2021), called income composition inequality.
Income composition inequality describes how the composition of income in
two sources, such as capital and labor income, varies across the income distribu-
tion. Income composition inequality is at its maximum when the two sources are
separately earned by the top and the bottom of the income distribution, and mini-
mum when all individuals have the same relative composition of capital and labor
income. Under a high level of income composition inequality, the link between the
functional and personal distribution of income is strong. The underlying intuition
is the following: when income- rich individuals earn all capital income in the econ-
omy, an increase in the overall capital income share will raise the income of the rich
and, therefore, hamper the level of income inequality in society. The contrary sit-
uation holds true under a low degree of income composition inequality: a change
in the factor shares of income will not significantly influence the overall level of
income inequality.
To measure the level of compositional inequality, we adopt the income fac-
tor concentration (IFC) index (Ranaldi, 2021). The IFC index is a non- rank- based
measure of association and ranges between
1
and 1. It is equal to 1 when all
capital income is concentrated at the top and all labor income at the bottom of the
total income distribution, and to 0 when all individuals have the same composition
of capital and labor income. Finally, it is equal to
1
when the capital income is
concentrated at the bottom and the labor income at the top.
By studying the dynamics of the IFC index in Italy, we show that income
composition inequality decreases steadily between 1989 and 2016. We show that
this result is robust to different assumptions on the allocation of income across
household members, different treatment of self- employment income, and differ-
ent definitions of labor income. The main result is also robust to the exclusion of
rental incomes from the definition of capital income. However, it is affected by
the way rental incomes are treated. The exclusion of imputed rents from our base-
line income definition leads to increasing income composition inequality— or to a
higher concentration of capital income at the top and labor income at the bottom
of the distribution— between 2000 and 2008. This is explained by the fact that
actual rents have shifted toward the top in all years preceding the financial crisis.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex