The Effects of Organizational Scandals on the Desirability of Public Organizations as Places to Work: Evidence From the VA Waitlist Scandal

Published date01 January 2024
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/02750740231191524
AuthorShinwoo Lee,Gordon Abner,Taha Hameduddin
Date01 January 2024
The Effects of Organizational Scandals on
the Desirability of Public Organizations as
Places to Work: Evidence From the VA
Waitlist Scandal
Shinwoo Lee
1
, Gordon Abner
2
, and Taha Hameduddin
3
Abstract
Public administration scholars have extensively explored organizational scandals through two lenses: (1) inside stories oforga-
nizational scandals examining the main causes of scandals and (2) the effects of scandals on trust in government, trust in gov-
ernmental off‌icials, and public f‌inancing. Yet, we know little about how organizational scandals affect government employees
work attitudes. Understanding how public employees react to organizational scandals deserves scholarlyattention because
public employees not only execute their agencieskey functions and programs but are involved in actively addressing the orga-
nizations failures. To address this gap, we apply a quasi-experimental approach using the 2014 Department of Veterans Affairs
waitlist scandal, with a specif‌ic focus on the effects of the scandal on employee job satisfaction and perceived organizational
attractiveness. Empirical results using the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey from 2011 to 2017 show that the organizational
scandal had a negative effect on both outcomes.
Keywords
organizational scandals, Department of Veterans Affairs scandal, employee job satisfaction, perceived organizational
attractiveness, quasi-experiment
Introduction
In April 2014, news of a scandal within the Veterans Health
Administration (VHA) made national headlines. The scandal
centered on allegations that employees were falsifying data
regarding the wait time to see doctors at Veterans Affairs
(VA) hospitals, starting with allegations at a Phoenix VA hospi-
tal and then spreading to multiple VA facilities across the
United States (American Legion, 2014). An internal audit
report of the VA later discovered that more than 120,000 veter-
ans were left waiting for care or had never been served, leading
to the deaths of 40 veterans (VA Off‌ice of Inspector General,
2014). Actual wait times were on average 115 days long;
much longer than the VAs 14-day waiting goal as well as
the24-daywaitingperioditfalselyreported(VAOff‌ice of
Inspector General, 2014). The scandal dominated news head-
lines for months: both the VA and its Inspector General were
heavily criticized for downplaying the seriousness of the whis-
tleblower allegations, and VA administrators were found to
have maintained secret lists of actual wait times (Lopez,
2014a). The central question motivating this article is what
effects, if any, do such organizational scandals have on the
work attitudes of public employees.
Scandalssuch as the VA waitlist exampleare gener-
ally def‌ined as violations of accepted values and social
norms, which are exposed through the media, [and] arouse
public criticism and anger(Huberts et al., 2022, p. 333).
Public administration scholars have extensively explored
two aspects of organizational scandals. The f‌irst line of
research focuses on inside stories to investigate the main
causes of organizational scandals (e.g., Eikenberry et al.,
2007; Molina, 2018; Mujkic & Klingner, 2019; Nelson &
Afonso, 2019; Patrick et al., 2018; Schneider, 2005). The
second line of literature explores the effects of scandals on
trust in government and government off‌icials (Bowler &
Karp, 2004; Solé-Ollé & Sorribas-Navarro, 2018; Wang,
1
The Department of Public Administration, Incheon National University,
Incheon, South Korea
2
The LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texasat Austin, Austin, TX,
USA
3
The Martin School of Public Policy and Administration, University of
Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
Corresponding Author:
Gordon Abner, The LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas at
Austin, 2315 Red River St, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Email: gordon.abner@austin.utexas.edu
Article
American Review of Public Administration
2024, Vol. 54(1) 1932
© The Author(s) 2023
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/02750740231191524
journals.sagepub.com/home/arp

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex