The Effects of Mother Participation in Relationship Education on Coparenting, Parenting, and Child Social Competence: Modeling Spillover Effects for Low‐Income Minority Preschool Children

AuthorFrancesca Adler‐Baeder,Kate Taylor Harcourt,Thomas Smith,Scott Ketring,Brian Vaughn,Chelsea Garneau,Julianne McGill
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12267
Date01 March 2018
Published date01 March 2018
The Effects of Mother Participation in Relationship
Education on Coparenting, Parenting, and Child
Social Competence: Modeling Spillover Effects for
Low-Income Minority Preschool Children
FRANCESCA ADLER-BAEDER*
CHELSEA GARNEAU
BRIAN VAUGHN*
JULIANNE MCGILL*
KATE TAYLOR HARCOURT
SCOTT KETRING*
THOMAS SMITH*
Although suggestions are that benefits of relationship and marriage education (RME)
participation extend from the interparental relationship with parenting and child ou t-
comes, few evaluation studies of RME test these assumptions and the relationship among
changes in these areas. This quasi-experimental study focuses on a parallel process growth
model that tests a spillover hypothesis of program effects and finds, in a sample of low-
income minority mothers with a child attending a Head Start program, that increases in
mother reports of coparenting agreement for RME participants predict decre ases in their
reports of punitive parenting behaviors. Although improvements in parenting behaviors
did not predict increases in teacher reports of children’s social competence, improvements
in coparenting agreement were associated with increases in children’s social competence
over time. In addition, comparative tests of outcomes between parents in the program and
parents in a comparison group reveal that RME program participants (n=171) demon-
strate significant improvements compared to nonparticipants (n=143) on coparenting
agreement, parenting practices, and teachers’ reports of preschool children’s social compe-
tence over a 1 year period. The findings are offered as a step forward in better understand-
ing the experiences of low-resource participants in RME. Implications for future rese arch
are discussed.
Keywords: Relationship Education; Child Social Competence; Coparenting; Parenting;
Minority Families; Program Evaluation
Fam Proc 57:113–130, 2018
*Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Auburn University, Auburn, AL.
Department of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
Department of Human Development and Family Science, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Francesca Adler-Baeder, Department
Human Development and Family Studies, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849. E-mail: Francesca@
auburn.edu.
This study was supported through a grant from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Administration for Children and Families (90FE0001). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommen-
dations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families.
113
Family Process, Vol. 57, No. 1, 2018 ©2016 Family Process Institute
doi: 10.1111/famp.12267
Several decades of research have highlighted the role of adult relationships in the devel-
opment of children within the family (Doherty & Beaton, 2004; Erel & Burman, 1995;
Krishnakumar & Buehler, 2000; Teubert & Pinquart, 2010). Specifically, children who
grow up in homes with high levels of interparental conflict and hostility are at increased
risk for socio-emotional, behavioral, academic, and health problems (Benson, Buehler, &
Gerard, 2008; El-Sheikh & Hinnant, 2011). Results from these studies are consistent with
both a family systems perspective that assumes cross-dyad influences regarding the con-
tent and quality of interactions, and social learning theory that emphasizes observational
processes (Bandura, 1977; Whitchurch & Constantine, 1993). The empirical evidence of
linkages among interparental relationship functioning, parenting practices, and children ’s
social development is so robust that scholars have called for interventions focused on pro-
moting healthy interparental relationships in the family in order to promote childr en’s
positive social development, particularly in the early years and for more vulnerable chil-
dren (Buehler & Gerard, 2002; Hawkins, Carroll, Doherty, & Willoughby, 2004; Kouros,
Cummings, & Davies, 2010). More complete tests of these linkages following intervention
participation, however, are very limited.
Early Social Competence
The development of age appropriate social skills and prosocial competencies are impor-
tant milestones of the preschool period (Waters & Sroufe, 1983) and lay the foundation for
later social competencies and related outcomes. Specifically, children’s socio-emotional
competencies at entry into kindergarten positively predict successful adjustment to schoo l
and academic achievements (Ladd, 2005). Furthermore, individual differences in social
competence in the first preschool year tend to be preserved across early childhood (Santos,
Vaughn, Peceg uina, Daniel, & Shin, 2014; Shin et al., 2011) and into the elementary
school years (Howes, Droege, & Matheson, 1994).
Children living in low-income and ethnic minority families and neighborhoods experi-
ence greater challenges in social competence development (Morrison, Ponitz, & McClel-
land, 2010), and early social competence may be particularly important for school-related
outcomes for children from more disadvantaged backgrounds (Fantuzzo, Perry, & McDer-
mott, 2004). Miles and Stipek (2006) examined longitudinal associations among pros ocial
behaviors and literacy achievement in a sample of low-income children and found that
children who engaged in more prosocial behaviors in first grade engaged in more prosocial
behaviors and had higher literacy achievement 2 years la ter. Another study of low-income
elementary school children found that both higher initial levels of social competence and
gains in social competence over the course of a year predicted more positive academic out-
comes, and this finding was significantly stronger for African-American children than for
European-American children (Elias & Haynes, 2008).
Interparental Relationship, Parenting Practices, and Child Outcomes
Research that considers interparental conflict and its links to child maladjustment
(e.g., cognitive, social, and academic functioning) consistently finds significant, yet modest
relationships (Fincham, 1994; Teubert & Pinquart, 2010). An early meta-analysis of 33
studies documented the negative association between interparental conflict and child
adjustment, with a mean effect size of d=.16 (Reid & Crisafulli, 1990). Several studies
utilizing genetically informed designs find an influence of the environment, including rela-
tional hostility and hostile parenting, on children’s social competence behaviors, above
and beyond the influence of shared genes (Rhoades et al., 2011; Stover et al., 2012, 2016).
Concurrent links are found at all stages of child and adolescent development (Benson
et al., 2008; El-Sheikh et al., 2009; Kouros, Merrilees, & Cummings, 2008). More recent
www.FamilyProcess.org
114
/
FAMILY PROCESS

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT