The Effect of Administrative Burden on Farmers’ Perceptions of Cross‐Compliance‐Based Direct Payment Policy

Published date01 July 2021
AuthorGabriele Mack,Christian Ritzel,Katja Heitkämper,Nadja El Benni
Date01 July 2021
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13335
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
664
Abstract: In this study, we test the hypothesis that farmers’ experienced administrative burden affects their policy
perceptions. Based on survey data from 808 randomly chosen Swiss farmers, a latent class approach is used to depict
the heterogeneity of farmers’ policy perceptions. We find that 20 percent of farmers are grumpy with the current direct
payment policy, 23 percent are supporters, and 57 percent are indifferent, meaning that the latter group of farmers
neither agree nor disagree with the direct payment policy. Regression results indicate that the higher the perceived
administrative burden, the higher the probability of belonging to the grumpy class of farmers. Additionally, our results
show that grumpy farmers have less social exchange than their peers and exhibit lower environmental awareness. Our
findings show that the bureaucracy involved in agricultural policy matters not only because it increases private and
public administrative costs but also because it negatively shapes farmers’ view of agricultural policy.
Evidence for Practice
A minority of 20 percent of Swiss farmers has a negative perception of the cross-compliance-based direct
payment policy (grumpy farmers).
Farmers’ experienced administrative burden negatively influences their perception of the cross-compliance
based direct payment policy.
Farmers who are less socially involved and less environmentally aware are more likely to be grumpy about the
cross-compliance-based direct payment policy.
Based on our findings, policy makers can more appropriately address dissatisfaction with politics in rural areas.
The shift in agricultural policy from price
support to direct payments and the growing
number of environmental regulations have
substantially increased farmers’ administrative
requirements (Falconer2000; Falconer and
Saunders2002; McCann et al.2005; Rørstad, Vatn,
and Kvakkestad2007). If farmers want to receive
payments from the state, they have to fill in a number
of forms and compile various documents annually to
prove eligibility.
Since the European Union (EU) introduced
direct payments in 1992, farmers have criticized
the associated bureaucratization of the common
agricultural policy (CAP) (Daugbjerg2003). Even in
1999, on average 61 percent of EU farmers thought
that CAP administrative procedures were “far too
heavy” (30 percent), or “too heavy” (31 percent)
(Commission2000, cited in Daugbjerg2003).
Although European farmers’ unions have constantly
demanded a simplification of administrative
procedures during the last 20 years, farmers still
complain about the administrative requirements.
For example, a survey by Mack, Stoinescu, and
Heitkämper(2019) conducted in Switzerland in
2019 has shown that a majority of farmers (63
percent) perceived their administrative requirements
as onerous or much too onerous. In the media,
some farmers even describe themselves as “slaves of
the state” (ZSZ Zürichsee-Zeitung2019). Various
studies have confirmed that farmers often perceive
administrative requirements as complex, stressful,
and demanding (Kallioniemi et al.2016; Reissig,
Crameri, and von Wyl2019; Vernimmen, Verbeke,
and Huylenbroeck2000).
A growing body of research is focusing on the
consequences when administrative requirements
are experienced as a burden. Evidence from
public administration research suggests that the
administrative burden experienced can promote
as well as undermine visions of citizenship such
as social trust, civic engagement, confidence in
government, and trust in public officials (Wichowsky
and Moynihan2008). Herd and Moynihan(2018,
2) stated that “the presence of burdens makes the
difference as to whether government is experienced as
accessible or opaque, simple or bewildering, respectful
or antagonistic.” This is considered as particularly
important “in our current age of polarization and
declining faith in the government” (Herd and
Moynihan2018, 3). In this context, it has been shown
Gabriele Mack
Christian Ritzel
Katja Heitkämper
Nadja El Benni
Agroscope, Swiss Federal Centre of Excellence for
Research in the Agriculture and Food Sector
The Effect of Administrative Burden on Farmers’ Perceptions
of Cross-Compliance-Based Direct Payment Policy
Research Article
Nadja El Benni is head of the research
department “Competitiveness and System
Evaluation” and member of the Directory
board of Agroscope, the Swiss Centre of
Excellence for research in the agriculture
and food sector, affiliated with the Federal
Office for Agriculture. Her research interest
is on the effect of agricultural policy on
farmers’ decision-making and its effects on
sustainability at farm and sector level.
Email: nadja.el-benni@agroscope.admin.ch
Katja Heitkämper is a researcher at
the Automation and Labor Organization
Research Group of Agroscope, the Swiss
Federal Centre of Excellence for research in
the agriculture and food sector. Her research
focuses on labor economics in agriculture
and modelling of labor time requirement.
Email: Katja.heitkaemper@agroscope.
admin.ch
Christian Ritzel is a research fellow at
the Socioeconomic Research Group of
Agroscope, the Swiss Federal Centre of
Excellence for research in the agriculture
and food sector. His research focuses on
socio-economic aspects of agriculture,
nutrition, and trade.
Email: Christian.ritzel@agroscope.admin.ch
Gabriele Mack is a senior researcher
at the Socioeconomic Research Group of
Agroscope, the Swiss Federal Centre of
Excellence for research in the agriculture
and food sector. Her research focuses on
socio-economic aspects of agricultural
policy and agent-based agricultural sector
modelling.
Email: Gabriele.mack@agroscope.admin.ch
Public Administration Review,
Vol. 81, Iss. 4, pp. 664–675. © 2020 The
Authors. Public Administration Review
published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of
The American Society for Public Administration.
DOI: 10.1111/puar.13335.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex