The Double Entendre of Juvenile Prostitution: Victim versus Delinquent and the Necessity of State Uniformity

Published date01 June 2014
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12021
Date01 June 2014
The Double Entendre of Juvenile Prostitution:
Victim versus Delinquent and the Necessity of
State Uniformity
By Ellen B. Fichtelman
ABSTRACT
Under the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA), minors perform-
ing commercial sex acts are deemed victims of human trafficking; however, prosecu-
tors and judges continue to charge and adjudicate minors as prostitution offenders
rather than as sexually exploited youth. To stop the perpetuation and victimization of
sexually exploited children, states must join the movement in reform to match the
standards of the TVPA. The federal law presumes that minors charged with prosti-
tution are victims rather than criminals and are in need of specialized social services.
To protect victims of sex trafficking, states should pass legislation in line with the
TVPA, creating a presumption of immunity for all prostituted minors.
I. INTRODUCTION
Prostitution is one of the very youngest professions; approximately eighty percent
of current adult prostitutes began their profession when they were younger than eigh-
teen1and the average age of entry into the prostitution industry is between eleven and
fourteen.2Domestic Minor Sex Trafficking (DMST) is the commercial exploitation of
America’s children through prostitution, pornography, and sexual performance within
the borders of the U.S.3DMST occurs when a U.S. citizen under eighteen is recruited or
1 Marihug Cedeño, Pimps, Johns, and Juvenile Prostitutes: Is New York Doing Enough to
Combat the Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children?, 22 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 153, 157 (2012).
2Id.; Tamar R. Brickhead, The “Youngest Profession”: Consent, Autonomy, and Prostituted
Children, 88 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1055, 1061 (2011); See Megan Annitto, Consent, Coercion, and Compassion:
Emerging Legal Responses to the Sexual Exploitation of Minors, 30 Yale L. &Pol. Rev. 1, 9 (2011); See Tanya
Mir, Trick or Treat: Why Minors Engaged in Prostitution Should be Treated as Victims, Not Criminals, 51
Fam. Ct. Rev. 163, 165 (2013).
3 Shared Hope Int’l, Domestic Minor Sex Trafficking: Child Sex Slavery in Broward and Dade Counties,
Florida 1 (2009), available at http://sharedhope.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/BrowardsandDadeFlorida
_printerfriendly.pdf
Ellen B. Fichtelman is President of the Florida Association for Women Lawyers of Stetson and a
candidate for Juris Doctor at Stetson University College of Law.
bs_bs_banner
Juvenile and Family Court Journal 65, No. 3-4 (Summer/Fall) 27
© 2014 National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges
obtained for a commercial sex act;4the term “commercial sex act” refers to any sex act
given in exchange for anything of value to the person preforming the act.5Sex trafficking
has traditionally been stereotyped as a problem of third world countries.6But, this
misconception fails to recognize the prevalence of DMST in both urban and rural areas of
the U.S.7Over a decade of research has classified the sexual exploitation of youth as a
national epidemic and one of “the most hidden form[s] of child abuse in the U.S.”8It is
estimated that roughly “40,000 of the estimated 1.6 million American runaway children
are trafficked,”9and that they are predominately products of abusive homes.10
Part II of this paper will address the commercial sex exploitation of U.S. youth and
the facets of the sex trafficking industry. Part III addresses the competing legal practices
surrounding DMST. It will focus on the evolution of the federal Trafficking Victims
Protection Act (TVPA) as well as the status of minors under New York, Illinois, and
Florida state laws. Part III will then address the prosecution of children for prostitution
under these laws. Part IV discusses recommended reforms and solutions for the prosecu-
tion of minors for prostitution. This section will address judicial decision making and
legislative reform.
II. COMMERCIAL SEX EXPLOITATION OF U.S. YOUTH/ THE
CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING INDUSTRY
The sad reality is that pimps exploit youths because it is a profitable industry;11
pimps target vulnerable children because people are willing to pay to have sex with
youth.12 An informal study conducted by the Polaris Project revealed that just one girl
could make $500 to $1000 in one night; a pimp working four girls seven days a week
could make well over $632,000 per year.13 Additionally, some law enforcement officials
suggest that gangs have shifted from drugs to prostitution because selling girls is “just
4 Tyson Elliot, Statewide Human Trafficking Coordinator, Office of Refugee Services., Fla. Dep’t
of Child & Fams., Presentation by Florida’s Center for Child Welfare: Domestic Minor Sex Trafficking (Sept. 8,
2011), available at http://centervideo.forest.usf.edu/summit11/sextraffic/sextraffic.html
5Id.
6 Sarah Primrose, Note, Killing the Messenger: Intersection Between Sex Trafficking, Planned
Parenthood & the Marginalization of Youth Victims, 22 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 299, 300 (2011).
7Id. (explaining the current culture of sex trafficking affects a wide variety of people, not just the
poor or teenage runaways).
8 Study: Child Sex Abuse “Epidemic” in U.S., CNN.com (Sept. 11, 2001), available at: http://
edition.cnn.com/2001/LAW/09/10/child.exploitation/index.html.
9 Janelle Zabresky, Student Author, Creating a Safe Harbor for Florida’s Children: An overview of
Florida’s Legislative Evolution in Domestic minor Sex Trafficking, 40 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 415, 417 (2013).
10 See Wendi J. Adelson, Child Prostitute or Victim of Trafficking?, 6 U. St. Thomas L.J. 96, 112
(2008) (noting that most runaways leave abusive homes and turn to sex trade as a means of support from their
traffickers).
11 Polaris Project, Domestic Sex Trafficking: The Criminal Operation of the American Pimp,available
at http://www.dcjs.virginia.gov/victims/humantrafficking/vs/documents/Domestic_Sex_Trafficking_Guide
.pdf (last visited Nov. 3, 2012).
12 Cedeño, Supra n. 1, at 163.
13 Polaris Project, Supra n. 11.
28 | JUVENILE AND FAMILY COURT JOURNAL / Summer/Fall 2014

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT