The Clevo case: A timeline of IFRS “Reluctance”

Published date01 October 2021
AuthorYu‐Lin Hsu,Gavin C. Reid
Date01 October 2021
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22510
Received:  April Accepted:  July 
DOI: ./jcaf.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
The Clevo case: A timeline of IFRS “Reluctance”
Yu-Lin Hsu1Gavin C. Reid2,3
Department of Accounting and Finance,
University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
School of Economics and Finance,
University of St Andrews, St Andrews,
UK
Centre for Business Research at
Cambridge Judge Business School,
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Correspondence
Yu-LinHsu, Department of Accounting
andFinance, University of Strathclyde,
Level, Stenhouse Wing, University of
Strathclyde, Cathedral Street, Glasgow,
GQU, UK.
Email:yulin.hsu@strath.ac.uk
Abstract
There is an ongoing policy debate over whether the adoption of IFRS should be
mandatory.All Taiwanese listed companies had to adopt IFRS from , but they
could choose to adopt earlier in . Surprisingly, given cross-national compar-
isons, not one Taiwanese company adopted early. This is an extreme example
of policy “reluctance.” We explore this unique setting, by analyzing a leading
reluctant Taiwanese company, Clevo. It was widely known as a potential early
adopter but withdrew at the last minute. This paper illustrates how a firm which
perceived net benefits would be incentivized to adopt IFRS early, but then how
uncertainties in regulations could stall such intentions. Through discussing how
the accounting regulators responded to this firm’s actions (and vice versa), this
paper helps us to understand better the prerequisites for effective policy design
and corporate decision-making in the context of IFRS adoption and implemen-
tation. This paper, using a qualitative research method, will also add to exiting
IFRS literature which mainly focuses on quantitative analysis.
KEYWORDS
fair value, IFRS, investment properties, policy reluctance, regulations, regulatory change
1 INTRODUCTION
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) was
first established in , with the aim of worldwide harmo-
nization of accounting terminology, professional practice,
and financial statement analysis. Its mission was to foster
transparency,accountability, and efficiency across all mar-
kets in all nations by the use of new International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS) (Pacter,). Today,IFRS has
been formally established in over  jurisdictions, with
many more allowing their partial use. The implementation
of IFRS occurs either at an exact date, or within a “win-
dow” of dates. The latter allows voluntary early adoption
(Soderstrom & Sun, ).
This paper investigates how this voluntary adoption
period can create policy concerns that ultimately impede
the introduction of IFRS, using the case study of the
Taiwanese-originated Clevo Company (hereinafter simply
“Clevo”). Clevo was selected because it wasinitially a high-
profile IFRS early adopter, and attracted much attention,
at the time, from the media, practitioners and account-
ing regulators (Li & Chang, ). However, in the end,
all Taiwanese companies, including Clevo, chose not to
adopt IFRS early.Over a decade after IFRS was introduced,
Christensen () wondered why adoption of IFRS was
not always attractive,as the academic arguments tended to
favor adoption. This paper explores in micro-detail why, in
practice, early adoption of IFRS proved to be unattractive
in Taiwan. Our qualitative evidence will add to the exist-
ing literature which focuses on quantitative analysis, and
this paper will contribute to the ongoing discussion about
the worldwide non-adoption of IFRS (Christensen, ;
Pownall & Wieczynska, ).
This paper is also relevant to understanding the con-
tinued appetite for adopting IFRS in neighboring ASEAN
countries (Joshi et al., ). This has spread to countries
such as Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, and South Korea
in recent year (Kwon et al., ). It is even in the sightline
J Corp Account Finance. ;:–. ©  Wiley PeriodicalsLLC65wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jcaf

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT