Testing the Systemic Model of Social Disorganization Theory in South Korean Neighborhoods: A Latent Class Growth Analysis Approach to Specifying Pathways to Homicide

AuthorYung Hyeock Lee,Sujung Cho,Shannon B. Harper
DOI10.1177/1088767920941564
Published date01 May 2021
Date01 May 2021
Subject MatterArticles
https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767920941564
Homicide Studies
2021, Vol. 25(2) 139 –163
© 2020 SAGE Publications
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/1088767920941564
journals.sagepub.com/home/hsx
Article
Testing the Systemic Model
of Social Disorganization
Theory in South Korean
Neighborhoods: A Latent
Class Growth Analysis
Approach to Specifying
Pathways to Homicide
Sujung Cho1, Yung Hyeock Lee2,
and Shannon B. Harper3
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between structural characteristics and homicide
trajectories in South Korean neighborhoods utilizing the systemic model of social
disorganization theory as an analytical lens. Group-based trajectory modeling of
Korean homicide data across 229 municipal-level sub-national regions between 2008
and 2013 yielded three groups: high-decrease, moderate, and low-stable. The odds of
belonging to the high and moderate groups compared to the low-stable group were
significantly increased for communities with a higher-level divorce rate and residential
instability rate. Social control was significant in the high-decrease group compared to
the low-stable group, but had no mediating effect on this relationship.
Keywords
systemic model of social disorganization theory, homicide developmental trajectories,
neighborhood structural characteristics, social controls, latent class growth analysis
1Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, USA
2KonKuk University, ChungJu-Si, ChungCheongBuk-Do, South Korea
3Iowa State University, Ames, USA
Corresponding Author:
Yung Hyeock Lee, Department of Police Science, KonKuk University, 268 ChunWon-DaeRo, ChungJu-Si,
ChungCheongBuk-Do 380-701, South Korea.
Email: police@kku.ac.kr
941564HSXXXX10.1177/1088767920941564Homicide StudiesCho et al.
research-article2020
140 Homicide Studies 25(2)
Introduction
In the United States, scholars have extensively studied the dramatic increase in homi-
cide and other violent crime in the late 1980s and early 1990s and 40% decrease by the
end of the century (Baumer et al., 2018). While an abundance of literature explores
homicide trends in the Western world (e.g., Farrell et al., 2011, 2014; Rosenfeld &
Messner, 2009; Tseloni et al., 2010), minimal research examines these trends in non-
Western nations. In South Korea (hereafter: Korea) for example, homicide rates have
increased across time and are higher than those in other democratic nations (Chawla,
2010a, 2010b; Korean National Police Agency [KNPA], 2000–2010; Organisation for
Economic Cooperation and Development, 2016).
Much of the prior research on neighborhoods and crime tests the validity of social
disorganization theory. Development of social disorganization theory has shifted to
exploring a systemic model wherein community-level social controls such as recre-
ation centers, social welfare spending, political participation, and religious institutions
mediate the relationship between structural factors and crime (Clear et al., 2003;
Goudriaan et al., 2006; Kubrin & Weitzer, 2003; Sampson et al., 1997). These social
controls help communities to recognize common goals and disrupt the criminogenic
effects of social disorganization. Several studies have found that community institu-
tions serving as social control mechanisms mediate the relationship between negative
structural conditions and crime/homicide (Maume & Lee, 2003; Peterson et al., 2000;
Yoon, 2018).
Despite a growing body of contextually oriented research on homicide in neighbor-
hoods in the United States (e.g., Kubrin & Herting, 2003; Stults, 2010), minimal
research has employed longitudinal designs to explore growth patterns of homicide in
a unique Korean context in which community-level structural characteristics and
social controls are important to understanding homicide. Such research is important as
foundational social disorganization concepts, such as residential instability and popu-
lation turnover, are temporal in nature (Fagan & Davies, 2004; Stults, 2010). Further,
minimal research has identified neighborhood subgroups within the larger population
and their unique patterns of homicide developmental trajectories.
Using 6-year nationally representative data (2008–2013), the current study seeks to
fill these gaps in the literature through identification of homicide trajectories in Korean
neighborhoods using group based trajectory modeling (GBTM); and examination of
how community-level structural characteristics associated with systemic social disor-
ganization theory (i.e., divorce rate, family income, financial independence, growth
rate in population, residential instability, residential heterogeneity, and crime rate), and
social controls (i.e., health-care service and social service organization) affect mem-
bership in those trajectories.
Theoretical Framework
Social disorganization theory as conceptualized by Shaw and McKay (1942) argues
that community-level structural factors such as poverty, ethnic heterogeneity, and

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT