Temporary Restraining Orders and Temporary Injunctions

AuthorScott Brister (Ret.)/Dan S. Boyd
Pages693-748
17-1
Chapter 17
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDERS
AND TEMPORARY INJUNCTIONS
QUICK VIEW
Definitions: A temporary restraining order (TRO) maintains the status quo between parties to a suit until the
court can hold a hearing to determine whether to issue a temporary injunction. A temporary injunction (TI)
maintains the status quo between parties to a suit until the suit is finally resolved.
Scope of chapter: Grounds for obtaining and opposing temporary injunctive relief; proper and improper sub-
jects for temporary injunctive relief; how to obtain and oppose a TRO or TI; dissolution, modification, and
enforcement of TROs and TIs; interlocutory appeal of TIs; suit for wrongful injunction; sample forms.
Strategies and tactics: Counsel should devote just as much preparation to hearings on temporary matters as to
trial on the merits. Temporary orders are not intended as a substitute for a trial on the merits, but they sometimes
have that effect. And the ruling may create interim hardships for the losing party and have a significant effect on
the range of settlement offers.
Statutes and rules: CPRC §§65.001-65.045; TRCP 680-693.
Related topics: Motions, Ch 16; Venue, Ch 9; Parties, Ch 6.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Overview
§17:01 In General
§17:02 Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”)
§17:03 Temporary Injunction (“TI”)
§17:04 Permanent Injunction
§17:04.1 Post-Judgment Injunction
§17:05 Prohibitory vs. Mandatory Injunctions
§17:06 Title of Order Not Dispositive
§17:07 Importance of Temporary Relief
§17:08 CAVEAT: Family Law Cases Governed by Different Rules
(Rev. 10, 4/13)
TEXAS PRETRIAL PRACTICE 17-2
II. Grounds and Defenses
A. General Points
§17:14 Common-Law Equitable Grounds
§17:15 General Injunction Statute
§17:16 EXCEPTION: Statutory Injunctions
§17:17 Examples of Statutory Injunctions
§17:18 EXCEPTION: Real Estate
§17:19 TRO: Standards May Not Matter
B. Probable Right to Relief
§17:23 Allege Valid Cause of Action
§17:24 Claim Must Have Merit
§17:25 If Claims of Merit Conflict
§17:25.1 If Multiple Claims, At Least One Must Have Merit
§17:26 CASE EXAMPLES: Probable Right to Relief
§17:27 CASE EXAMPLES: No Probable Right to Relief
§17:28 Determination Not Law of Case
C. Probable Injury
§17:34 Elements
§17:35 Injury Must Be Imminent
§17:36 Injury Must Be Irreparable
§17:37 CASE EXAMPLES: Imminent Irreparable Injury
§17:38 CASE EXAMPLES: No Imminent Irreparable Injury
§17:39 EXCEPTIONS: No Showing of Irreparable Harm Needed
D. Lack of Adequate Remedy at Law
§17:44 Legal Remedy Must Be as Good as Equitable
§17:45 Overlap With Irreparable Harm
§17:46 Money Damages Inadequate
§17:47 CASE EXAMPLES: No Adequate Remedy at Law
§17:48 CASE EXAMPLES: Adequate Remedy at Law
§17:49 EXCEPTIONS: No Showing Needed
§17:50 Unrelated Avenues May Provide Legal Remedy
§17:51 Contract Provisions
E. Preservation of Status Quo
§17:56 Determining and Preserving the Status Quo
§17:57 TI Should Not Decide the Merits
§17:58 CASE EXAMPLES: TI Necessary to Preserve Status Quo
§17:59 CASE EXAMPLES: TI Did Not Preserve Status Quo
F. Other Equitable Considerations
§17:62 Balance of Equities
§17:63 CASE EXAMPLES: Balance Supported TI
§17:64 CASE EXAMPLES: Balance Supported Denying TI
§17:65 EXCEPTION: Statutory TI
§17:66 Public Interest
G. Defenses
§17:70 Unclean Hands
(Rev. 1, 12/00)
17-3 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDERS AND TEMPORARY INJUNCTIONS
§17:71 CASE EXAMPLES: Unclean Hands Barred TI
§17:72 CASE EXAMPLES: No Unclean Hands Bar
§17:73 Laches
III. Subject Matter
A. Covenants Not to Compete or Disclose
1. COVENANTS NOT TO COMPETE
§17:77 Contract Required
§17:78 Mandatory Statutory Requirements
§17:79 Ancillary to Enforceable Agreement
§17:79.1 Timing of Ancillary Consideration
§17:80 Legitimate Business Interest
§17:81 Reasonable Limitations: In General
§17:81.1 Reasonable Limitations: Time
§17:81.2 Reasonable Limitations: Area
§17:81.3 Reasonable Limitations: Scope of Activity and Customers
§17:81.4 Reformation of Unreasonable Limitations
§17:82 Wrongful Injunction
§17:83 Must Common Law TI Requirements Still Be Met?
2. COVENANTS NOT TO DISCLOSE
§17:88 Express Contract Not Required
§17:89 Scope of Relief
§17:89.1 Scope of Relief: Use or Competition?
§17:90 Probable Right to Recover
§17:91 Irreparable Injury and Inadequate Remedy
B. Anti-Suit Injunctions
§17:96 Injunction Directed to Parties and Attorneys
§17:97 Grounds
§17:97.1 Grounds: Threat to Jurisdiction
§17:97.2 Grounds: Public Policy
§17:97.3 Grounds: Multiplicity of Suits
§17:97.4 Grounds: Vexatious Litigation
§17:97.5 Grounds: Post-Judgment
§17:98 Enjoining Suits in Other Texas Courts
§17:99 Dominant Jurisdiction
§17:100 EXCEPTIONS
§17:101 IN PRACTICE: Seek Abatement of Second Suit
§17:102 Foreign Suits
§17:103 Federal Suits
§17:104 Vexatious Litigants
§17:105 Anti-Anti-Suit Injunctions
C. Other Proper Subjects for Injunctions
§17:110 General Injunction Statute
§17:111 Constitutionality of Civil Statutes
§17:112 Real Property: Drilling and Mining Operations
(Rev. 10, 4/13)
10-3

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT