Taxpayer Advocate Service Continues Fret Over Form 1023‐EZ

Published date01 October 2016
Date01 October 2016
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/npc.30252
Bruce R. Hopkins’ NONPROFIT COUNSEL
7
October 2016
THE LAW OF TAX-EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS MONTHLY
Bruce R. Hopkins’ Nonprofit Counsel DOI:10.1002/npc
Commissioner (summarized in the May 2012 issue)).
This foundation had transferred all of its assets to three
private foundations, which were held by the court to
not be subject to liability as transferees of a transferee.
The IRS appealed this case and a related one
(Diebold Foundation, Inc. v. Commissioner). These courts
of appeals remanded the decisions, having concluded
that the initial transfer was a fraudulent conveyance.
This time around, the Tax Court found that the transfers
to the foundations were fraudulent under state law and
that the foundations are liable for taxes, interest, and
penalties as transferees of a transferee (IRC § 6901).
IRS PUBLISHES HIGHLIGHTS
OF ITS STUDY OF CHARITIES
1985–2010
The IRS, on July 27, published highlights of data
gleaned from its study of tax-exempt charitable organi-
zations over the period 1985–2010. Not surprisingly, the
agency concluded that these entities “represent the vast
majority of [exempt] organizations, and account for the
bulk of the financial activity for the tax-exempt sector.”
The sector, the IRS observed, has grown “steadily and
significantly over the years.” One indicator of this phe-
nomenon is that total expenses reported by nonprofit
organizations showed a cumulative real growth of 127
percent during these 25 years, compared to a cumula-
tive growth over that period in gross domestic product,
which was 66 percent.
Other findings:
For tax year 2010, over 269,000 exempt charities
filed Forms 990, reporting nearly $3 trillion in assets
and $1.6 billion in revenue.
Due to an increase in the threshold for filing, the
number of Forms 990 and 990-EZ filed by charities
dropped for the first time since the IRS has been col-
lecting the data.
Larger exempt organizations, especially hospitals and
universities, “dominated” the financial activity of
the charitable sector. (Commerciality doctrine alert:)
These organizations received the majority of their
revenue from program services.
Smaller organizations relied on contributions and
grants as their primary source of revenue. [2.1]
IRS PUBLISHES PRIVATE
FOUNDATION DATA
The IRS, on the same date, published its new data on
private foundations, mostly for tax year 2012. Here are
the highlights:
Grants made during that year totaled $48.6 billion.
Total revenue of foundations was $95.3 billion.
Assets totaled $698.6 billion in value.
A total of 93,542 returns were filed.
The largest private foundations (at least $100 mil-
lion in assets) represented less than 1 percent of all
returns filed for the year, yet they were responsible
for 45 percent of the year’s grants, 50 percent of
total revenue, and 60 percent of total assets.
The median payout rate for the year was 5.2 percent.
The excise tax on failure to distribute income (IRC §
4942) was $7.1 million in 2015. [2.1]
TAXPAYER ADVOCATE
SERVICE CONTINUES FRET
OVER FORM 1023-EZ
The Taxpayer Advocate Service, in its Mid-Year Report
to Congress on Fiscal Year 2017 Objectives, states that
the TAS continues to find the Form 1023-EZ “insuf-
ficient,” charging that, by means of it, the IRS is “erro-
neously conferring IRC § 501(c)(3) status on ineligible
entities.” Indeed, TAS believes that this situation is so
dire that use of this application is contributing to the
federal tax gap. (Who knew these small organizations
had so much potentially taxable income?)
This fret of the TAS is partially based on its conclu-
sions in last year’s report (summarized in the September
2015 issue). Thereafter, TAS provided the IRS with a list
of 149 organizations that received favorable determina-
tion letters, having filed the EZ, that have (according to
the TAS) deficient articles of incorporation. (Remember
the days when the IRS’s backlogged inventory of appli-
cations for recognition of exemption topped 70,000?)
The IRS apparently has not followed up on these entities,
at least not to the satisfaction of the TAS. The agency
is of the view that to do so would taint the statistical
sample used by it in its postdetermination compliance
program.
The TAS reported that, during fiscal year 2017, it will
continue to:
Advocate that the IRS “address the needs” of these
149 organizations, requiring them to demonstrate
that they have properly amended their articles.
Evaluate, on the basis of the results of the IRS’s
postdetermination “audits” of Form 1023-EZ filers,
the extent to which these reviews “show significant
levels of noncompliance and whether the noncom-
pliance could have been averted through simple
revisions” of the application.
Evaluate the extent to which the IRS’s “broader
compliance framework yields information about the
behavior, needs, and preferences of exempt organi-
zations” (whatever that means). [26.1(h)(i)]

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT