A tardy budget: Plus: Record-setting veto pace; CBA's recent actions.

AuthorAllen, Bruce C.
PositionCapitolBeat

Finally, after setting a record for the longest delay in state history, California has a budget and the Legislature adjourned its two-year session.

Leading up to the final days of the the budget tug-o-war, in mid-September, the Legislature sent a revenue proposal to Gov. Schwarzenegger. The governor was not happy with provisions of the package and announced that he would veto the proposal. During the press conference when he announced his intention, the governor was asked what he would do if the Legislature voted to override his veto. He responded that he would only sign those bills that were important to the people of California in this time of fiscal crisis and veto the rest.

We all know the result.

The governor followed up on his pledge to veto legislation that had the potential to increase costs to California. He vetoed 174 pieces of legislation in the hours just before the final deadline. Added to his previous vetoes, the total for the two-year session reached 415 bills and only 771 were signed.

Gov. Schwarzenegger vetoed 35 percent of the legislation that made it to his desk--the highest rate for any governor since the California Legislature went full time 40 years ago.

Most of the vetoed measures were returned to the Legislature with the following message: "The historic delay in passing the 2008-2009 State Budget has forced me to prioritize the bills sent to my desk at the end of the year's legislative session. Given the delay, I am only signing bills that are the highest priority for California. This bill does not meet that standard and I cannot sign it at this time. Sincerely, Arnold Schwarzenegger."

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Redevelopment Agency Bill Vetoed

One of those bills the governor vetoed was SB 1689 (Lowenthal), which CalCPA opposed. The bill would have required the state controller to perform quality-control reviews of redevelopment agency audits.

As introduced, the bill also would have allowed the controller to unilaterally suspend audit firms from performing redevelopment agency audits for up to three years, if the reviewed firm's audits were judged to be deficient by the CBA. The bill's final version required a determination by the CBA prior to suspension.

The bill also would have increased the authority of the Department of Housing and Community Development.

Independent Contractor Misclassification

SB 1583 (Corbett) would have made a consultant who, "knowingly advises an employer to treat an individual as an independent...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT