A Tangled Web. ADA questions remain over web accessibility cases and the lack of DOJ regulations

AuthorAmanda Robert
Pages16-18
A Tangled Web
ADA questions remain over web accessibility cases
and the lack of DOJ regulations
By Amanda Robert
Karla Gilbride kept
getting lost while tr y-
ing to navigate unla-
beled buttons and
unorganized gr aphics
when searching online
for someone to handle her wedding
registry a nd invitations.
Gilbride, who is blind and uses a
screen reader, refuses to m ake even
one-time purchases fr om companies
with unnavigable website s. She can’t
walk into a store and se e products on
the shelves, but she can scroll down a
page and learn about them if a web -
site is accessible.
“It is something I deal with ever y
day in my life, try ing to purchase
things online and do my job and get
around the internet,” says Gilbride,
a sta at torney at Public Justice , a
nonprofi t legal advocac y organiza-
tion in Washington, D.C. “I encoun-
ter frustrat ions daily with roadblocks
to using the internet, wh ich could be
such a gateway to leveling the play-
ing fi eld.”
Disability rights a dvocates say
web accessibility—the prac tice of
designing and coding website s so
that people with disabil ities can use
them—can be accomplished th rough
simple changes, such as chang-
ing color contrast and adding v ideo
captions.
However, the legal landscape
surrounding web acce ssibility has
become more complex.
The Americans w ith Disabilities
Act, signed into law in 1990,
requires in Title III that businesses
serving as “pla ces of public accom-
modation” remove barriers to acc ess
for people with disabilities.
Under the ADA, places of public
accommodation include restau rants,
theaters, retai l stores and more . The
law does not explicitly addres s the
internet or mobile applications, leav-
ing courts around t he country to
decide how the law applies to com-
mercial websites.
Despite calls for cla rity, the
Department of Justice, the federa l
agency responsible for enforcing the
ADA, has not provided regulations
on the scope of the law in terms of
web accessibility.
Related lawsuits have also
increased dra matically, with the
vast majority fi led by a small
The Docket
EDITED BY BLAIR CHAVIS / BLAIR.CHAVIS@AMERICANBAR.ORG
SHUTTERSTOCK
National
Pulse
16 || ABA JOURNAL JULY-AUGUST 2019

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT