Talk Local to Me: Assessing the Heterogenous Effects of Localistic Appeals

Published date01 September 2023
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X231173402
AuthorB. Kal Munis,Richard Burke
Date01 September 2023
Subject MatterArticles
Article
American Politics Research
2023, Vol. 51(5) 655669
© The Author(s) 2023
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X231173402
journals.sagepub.com/home/apr
Talk Local to Me: Assessing the Heterogenous
Effects of Localistic Appeals
B. Kal Munis
1
and Richard Burke
2
Abstract
Contemporary public opinion in the United States has been characterized by affective polarization and the nationalization of
political behavior. In this paper, we examine whether local framing can decrease votersreliance on national partisan identities
when evaluating their representatives in the United States Congress. Relying on both an experimental study and observational
data from senatorsFacebook posts, we f‌ind evidence that talking localis an effective means for representatives to bypas s the
perceptual screenof partisanship . Candidates who go localin their communication style are able to expand their elect oral
coalition by appealing to independents and outpartisans alike. Observational f‌indings suggest that many politicians, especially
those representing competitive districts, are aware of this and go localstrategically.
Keywords
localism, nationalization, place, political communication, representation, social media
Political institutions in the United States are overwhelmingly
geographic in nature. From federalism to single-member
districts and the electoral college, American political insti-
tutional design assumes that preferences, wants, and needs
vary across geographies and that these realities ought to be
ref‌lected in the structures and operations of government (e.g.,
see the Federalist and Anti-federalist papers). Geographically
apportioned single-member districts, one of Americas more
unique electoral institutions, privileges the particularities of
geographic constituency to a signif‌icant extent, especially
when compared to alternative systems (Cain et al., 1987;
Hopkins, 2017). Recent trends in American politics, how-
ever, namely partisan polarization (e.g., Levendusky, 2009;
Mason, 2018) and nationalization (e.g., Hopkins, 2018),
suggest that there may no longer be much room for local,
particularistic considerations to sway public opinion. Going
local,in other words, may be fruitless if voters from Or-
lando, FL to Ovando, MT overwhelmingly crave homoge-
nized national partisan rhetoric. Moreover, if this is the case,
one of the core justif‌ications (e.g., geocentrism of the
American political heart and mind) articulated by the
American founders for much of American institutional
designparticularly regarding our electoral and represen-
tational institutions would no longer be applicable.
In this paper, we consider the effectiveness of local(i.e.,
non-national/subnational) appeals during a time where the
American electorate has been characterized by social sorting
(Mason, 2018) and affective polarization (Iyengar &
Westwood, 2015). We argue that local appeals can be
effective, specif‌ically among voters who do not share the
party of their U.S. Senator. We f‌irst establish this causal
relationship using a survey experiment that relies on ma-
nipulated Facebook posts. Next, we turn to data on Senators
Facebook posts and f‌ind that Senators in competitive states
are more likely to post about local topics and that local posts
are associated with heightened approval among out-partisans
and independents.
Why Local Sells: The Power of Place and
Representational Folk Wisdom
In October of 2020, as political polarization approached its
asymptote, the Facebook posts of one Maine Senator re-
f‌lected a more genteel era of American politics. Rather than
tether her candidacy to the highly contentious presidential
election or to the similarly divisive Supreme Court conf‌ir-
mation battle, Susan Collins (R-ME) posted about her work to
strengthen Mainesf‌ishing industry, renovate the Eastport
1
Department of History & Political Science, Utah Valley University, Orem,
UT, USA
2
Department of Government & Foreign Affairs, Hampden-Sydney College,
Hampden-Sydney, VA, USA
Corresponding Author:
B. Kal Munis, Department of History & Political Science, Utah Valley
University, Clarke Building, Orem, UT 84058, USA.
Email: kalmunis@live.com

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT