Take One for the Team? Limits of Shared Ethnicity and Candidate Preferences

AuthorSylvia Manzano,Gabriel R. Sanchez
Date01 September 2010
Published date01 September 2010
DOI10.1177/1065912909333130
Subject MatterArticles
Political Research Quarterly
63(3) 568 –580
© 2010 University of Utah
Reprints and permission:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/1065912909333130
http://prq.sagepub.com
Take One for the Team? Limits of
Shared Ethnicity and Candidate
Preferences
Sylvia Manzano1 and Gabriel R. Sanchez2
Abstract
This study tests the theory of politicized ethnic identity’s shaping Latino political behavior. The authors consider
whether candidate quality moderates the effects of political ethnic attachments on co-ethnic candidate preferences.
Ordered logistic regression models are developed to predict Latino voter preferences for co-ethnic candidates with
varied degrees of qualification. Candidate quality significantly mitigates collective ethnic political behavior, yet the
authors find Latinos with strong ethnic attachments remain inclined to prefer a co-ethnic even when less qualified than
a non-Latino candidate. Political ethnic identity theory is useful in explaining minority political behavior, but there are
boundaries to collective identity’s shaping political preferences.
Keywords
gender, race, ethnicity, identity, politics
While scholars debate the merits and effects of descriptive
representation on diverse populations, voters consistently
demonstrate their support for co-ethnic candidates. A sig-
nificant body of scholarly research highlights election
return patterns whereby the majority of voters, when
given a choice, cast ballots for candidates of shared eth-
nicity (Barreto 2007; Barreto, Villarreal, and Woods 2005;
Tate 2003; Kaufmann 2003a; Hill, Moreno, and Cue
2001; Terkildsen 1993). Debate ensues regarding the
causal factors for this empirical regularity that is typically
attributed to either co-ethnic affinity or partisanship, with
little attention to other potentially mitigating variables.
Minority candidates appear on the ballot most frequently
in elections in which partisanship is neutralized, in either
local nonpartisan races or primary contests. This reality
coupled with the general rise in candidate-centered cam-
paigns (Wattenberg 1991) calls for a more careful evalua-
tion of minority political behavior. Theories of ethnic
politics hold that collective group consciousness fosters a
sense of community loyalty that extends into the political
environment (Wolfinger 1965; Gurin, Miller, and Gurin
1980; Garcia 2003). We test this theory by asking whether
ethnic group politics is mitigated by candidate quality, an
important variable in the political behavior literature that
has heretofore been omitted from the minority political
behavior research. Pointed survey items are used to test
the influence of ethnic group consciousness on individual
voter preferences when faced with candidates of
varied quality and ethnicity. This study advances the
research in racial and ethnic politics by exploring the bound-
aries of ethnic attachments and incorporating the role of
candidate quality on vote choice.
Data from the 2004 National Survey of Latinos: Poli-
tics and Civic Participation, conducted by the Pew His-
panic Center and the Kaiser Family Foun dation,1 affords
the opportunity to explore Latino voter preferences in
different scenarios: (1) when a Latino candidate and a
non-Latino challenger are equally qualified and (2) when
a Latino candidate is less qualified than a non-Latino
opponent. Candidate preferences in these different con-
texts are modeled as function of group identity to test the
extent to which ethnic consciousness and ethnic attach-
ments account for co-ethnic candidate support. Including
candidate quality in the theoretical conceptualization and
empirical models offers a more complete interpretation
of minority political behavior than most studies have pre-
sented. The analysis shows the effects of ethnic politics
are significantly tempered by candidate quality such that
1Texas A&M University, College Station
2University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
Corresponding Authors:
Sylvia Manzano, Assistant Professor, Texas A&M University
Email: smanzano@politics.tamu.edu.
Gabriel R. Sanchez, Assistant Professor, University of New Mexico
Email: sanchezg@unm.edu.
PRQ333130.indd 568 03/08/2010 8:17:33 PM

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT