Table of Cases

• Author: Barry E. Hill
• Pages: 9-10

Page ix

Tab le o f Ca se s

Administrative Complaint Involving the Oakland Airport Connector Project and the Bay Area

Rapid Transit District..................................................................................................................428

Administrative Complaint Involving Shintech Inc. a nd the L ouisiana D epart ment of

Environmental Quality ...................................................................................................... 387

Alexander v. Sandoval .......................................................................................................................... 458

Ball et al. v. Union Carbide Corp. ............................................................................................... 364

Bean v. Southwestern Waste Management Corp. ........................................................................ 328

Board of Commissioners v. Great L akes Transfer, LLC ..............................................................518

Communities Against Runway Expansion, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration ............................ 523

Darensburg 192 v. Metropolitan Transportation Commission ..............................................................331

Eagle Environmenta l II, L.P. v. Commonwealth of Penns ylvania ........ ................. ..................... 506

East-Bibb Twiggs Neighborhood Ass’n v. Macon-Bibb County Planning & Z oning

Commission .......................................................................................................................336

El Pueblo Para el A ire y Ag ua Limpio v. County of Kings (Plainti ’s Brief) .......... ........ ..........473

El Pueblo Para e l Aire y Agua Limpio v. County of Ki ngs (Opin ion) ..... ................. ........ ..............478

Elizondo et al. v. Royal Metal Finishing, Inc. .............................................................................. 353

Hart ford Park Tena nts Ass’n v. Rhod e Island Dep’t of Environmenta l Ma nagement ............... 4 82

Hart ford Park Tenants As s’n v. Rhode Island Dep’t of Envi ronmenta l Mana gement (Settlement

Agreement) ........................................................................................................................ 488

Hinds County v. Mississippi Commission on Env ironmental Qual ity .......... ......................... ... 515

Houston et al. v. City of Cocoa et al. (Complaint) .....................................................................374

Houston et al. v. City of Cocoa et al. (Consent Decree) ............................................................381

Houston et al. v. City of Cocoa et al. (Order) ............................................................................383

In re America n Marine Rail, Ltd. Liability Co............................................................................501

In re Chemical Waste Management of Indiana, Inc. ............................................................................ 269

In re Envotech, Ltd. Partnership .......................................................................................................... 270

In re Knauf Fiber Glass, GmbH ........................................................................................................... 274

In re South Bronx Unite! et al. v. New York City Industrial Development Agency et al. ..................... 93

In the Matter of Amendment to the Madison County Solid Waste Management Plan (Re Add ition

of North County Line Municipal Solid Waste Landl l) ...............................................................511

In the Matter of the Appl ication of Rhino Environmental Services (Colonia s De velopment

Council v. Rhino Envtl. Servs., Inc.) ................................................................................490

In the Matter of Louisiana Energy Service s L.P. (ASLB 1997) ................. ........ ................. .......123

In the Matter of Louisiana Energy Service s, L.P. (NRC 1998) ........ ........ ................. ........ ........ 125

Johnson et al. v. Orleans Parish School Board et al. ...................................................................... 73

Latin Americans for Social and Economic Development v. Federal Highway Administration .............. 370

Miller et al. v. City of Dal las ..................................................................................................... 344

Mossv ille Environ mental Action Now v. United States, Inter-A m. C.H.R. (petit ion) ........... ....622

Mossv ille Environ mental Action Now v. United States, Inter-A m. C.H.R. (response) .......... ....628

Mossv ille Environ mental Action Now v. United States, Inter-A m. C.H.R. (ruli ng) .................. 631

Neighbors for a Toxic Free Community e t al. v. Vulcan Materials Co. .......................................133

Nonnon et al. v. City of New York (Complaint) .................................................................................69

Padres Hacia Una Vida Mejor et al. v U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et a l. .........................412

Phillips v. e City of New York (Stipulation of Settlement) ......................................................... 72

Robinson Township, Washington County, PA et al. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al. .............638

Rosemere Neighborhood Association v. U.S. Environmenta l Protection Agency (9t h Cir.) ...............402

Rosemere Neighborhood Association v. U.S. Environmenta l Protection Agency ( W.D. Wash.) ........406