Table of Cases
| Library | Drug Litigation in South Carolina (SCBar) (2021 Ed.) |
Alabama v. Shelton, 535 U.S. 654, 122 S. Ct. 1764, 152 L. Ed. 2d 888 (2002)............................. 284
Albernaz v. United States, 450 U.S. 333 (1981)............................................................................... 82
Alexander v. State, 303 S.C. 539, 402 S.E.2d 484 (1991).............................................................. 303
Am. Home Assurance Co. v. Am. President Lines, 44 F.3d 774 (9th Cir. 1994)............................. 263
Anderson v. State, 338 S.C. 629, 527 S.E.2d 398 (2000)....................................................... 236, 238
Anderson v. State, 354 S.C. 431, 581 S.E.2d 834 (2003)................................................252, 266-267
Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) .................................................................................. 90
Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51, 109 S. Ct. 333, 102 L. Ed. 2d 281 (1988)........................... 221
Battle v. State, 382 S.C. 197, 675 S.E.2d 736 (2009).......................................................................40
Bell v. Leeke, 266 S.C. 563, 225 S.E.2d 188 (1976).......................................................................205
Benton v. Pellum, 232 S.C. 26, 100 S.E.2d 534 (1957).................................................................. 217
Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004).................................................................................... 90
Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S. Ct. 180, 76 L. Ed. 306 (1932)...................................................................................... 22, 80, 98, 101, 168
Blumenthal v. United States, 332 U.S. 539, 68 S. Ct. 248, 92 L. Ed. 2d 154 (1947)...................... 139
Boggs v. State Bd. of Medical Examiners, 288 S.C. 144, 341 S.E.2d 635 (1986).......................... 162
Bourjaily v. United States, 483 U.S. 171 (1987)............................................................................. 125
Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).................................................................................28, 69-74
Braverman v. United States, 317 U.S. 49, 63 S. Ct. 99, 87 L. Ed. 2d 23 (1942)............................ 133
Brightman v. State, 336 S.C. 348, 520 S.E.2d 614 (1999).................................................... 40, 43, 93
Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 (1977)...........................................................................................80-81
Brown v. State, 265 S.C. 516, 220 S.E.2d 125 (1975).................................................................... 205
Brown v. State, 333 S.C. 238, 510 S.E.2d 212 (1998)......................................................................78
Brown v. State, 343 S.C. 342, 540 S.E.2d 856 (2001).................................................. 46, 77, 79, 208
Brunson v. State, 324 S.C. 117, 477 S.E.2d 711 (1996)..................................................................8-9
Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S. Ct. 1620, 20 L. Ed. 2d 476 (1968)............ 122-124, 126
Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 564 U.S. 647 (2011).................................................................... 128-129
Campbell v. Louisiana, 523 U.S. 392, 118 S. Ct. 1419, 140 L. Ed. 2d 551 (1998)........................ 236
Carter v. State, 329 S.C. 355, 495 S.E.2d 773 (1998)........................................................ 21, 88, 166
Casey v. State, 305 S.C. 445, 409 S.E.2d 391 (1991)................................................................. 40, 42
Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 (1967)..................................................................................... 39
City of Beaufort v. Baker, 315 S.C. 146, 432 S.E.2d 470 (1993).................................................... 171
Clair v. State, 324 S.C. 144, 478 S.E.2d 54 (1996).................................................................... 94, 96
Condon v. One 1985 BMW, 4 Door, 312 S.C. 431, 440 S.E.2d 895 (Ct. App. 1994).................... 192
Craft v. State, 281 S.C. 205, 314 S.E.2d 330 (1984).............................................................. 203, 206
Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S. Ct. 1354, 158 L. Ed. 2d 177 (2004)........ 124-125, 127
Crist v. Bretz, 437 U.S. 28 (1978)..................................................................................................... 80
Cruz v. New York, 481 U.S. 186, 107 S. Ct. 1714, 95 L. Ed. 2d 162 (1987).................................. 123
Cupp v. Naughten, 414 U.S. 141 (1973)........................................................................................... 40
Curtis v. State, 345 S.C. 557, 549 S.E.2d 591 (2001)....................................................................... 37
Cutner v. State, 354 S.C. 151, 580 S.E.2d 120 (2003)...................................................... 79, 228, 232
Danforth v. Minnesota, 552 U.S. 264, 128 S. Ct. 1029, 169 L. Ed. 2d 859 (2008)........................ 131
Davis v. State, 336 S.C. 329, 520 S.E.2d 801 (1999)..................................................................... 277
Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 126 S. Ct. 2266, 165 L. Ed. 2d 224....................................... 130
Dervin v. State, 386 S.C. 164, 687 S.E.2d 712 (2009).................................................................90-91
DeWitt v. S.C. Dep't of Highways & Pub. Transp., 274 S.C. 184, 262 S.E.2d 28 (1980).............. 284
Dodd v. Berlinsky, 344 S.C. 172, 543 S.E.2d 237 (Ct. App. 2001)......................................... 121-122
Downum v. United States, 372 U.S. 734 (1963)............................................................................... 80
Ducworth v. Neely, 319 S.C. 158, 459 S.E.2d 896 (Ct. App. 1995)............................................... 192
Duke Power Co. v. S.C. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 284 S.C. 81, 326 S.E.2d 395 (1985)....... 142, 161, 299
Edwards v. State, 372 S.C. 493, 642 S.E.2d 738 (2007).................................................................225
Evans v. State, 363 S.C. 495, 611 S.E.2d 510 (2005)................224-225, 234-237, 241-242, 244-245
Ewing v. California, 538 U.S. 11, 123 S. Ct. 1179, 155 L. Ed. 2d 108 (2003)............................... 289
Ezell v. State, 345 S.C. 312, 548 S.E.2d 852 (2001).........................................................................66
Francis v. Franklin, 471 U.S. 307 (1985)...................................................................36-38, 40, 42-43
Gaines v. State, 335 S.C. 376, 517 S.E.2d 439 (1999)................................................................... 261
Gebardi v. United States, 287 U.S. 112, 53 S. Ct. 35, 77 L. Ed. 206 (1932).................................. 113
German v. State, 325 S.C. 25, 478 S.E.2d 687 (1996)....................................................................269
Gibbs v. State, 403 S.C. 484, 744 S.E.2d 170 (2013)............................................................48-50, 58
Gibson v. State, 334 S.C. 515, 514 S.E.2d 320 (1999)................................................................69-71
Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S. Ct. 792, 9 L. Ed. 2d 799 (1963)................................. 284
Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972).........................................................................69, 71-74
Gilmore v. State, 314 S.C. 453, 445 S.E.2d 454 (1994).................................................................. 43
Glaze v. State, 366 S.C. 271, 621 S.E.2d 655 (2005)..................................................................... 283
Grady v. Corbin, 495 U.S. 508, 110 S. Ct. 2084, 109 L. Ed. 2d 548 (1990).................................. 101
Granger v. State, 333 S.C. 2, 507 S.E.2d 322 (1998)....................................................93-94, 96, 226
Gray v. Maryland, 523 U.S. 185, 118 S. Ct. 1151, 140 L. Ed. 2d 294 (1998)........................ 123-124
Green v. Hewett, 305 S.C. 238, 407 S.E.2d 651 (1991)................................................................. 260
Green v. State, 338 S.C. 428, 527 S.E.2d 98 (2000)........................................................260, 264-265
Griffin v. Martin, 278 S.C. 620, 300 S.E.2d 482 (1983)................................................................. 303
Harden v. State, 360 S.C. 405, 602 S.E.2d 48 (2004)............................................................. 100, 107
Harris v. State, 349 S.C. 46, 562 S.E.2d 311 (2002).............................................................. 100, 291
Hope v. State, 328 S.C. 78, 492 S.E.2d 76 (1997).................................................................... 81, 231
Hopkins v. State, 317 S.C. 7, 451 S.E.2d 389 (1994)......................................... 79, 96, 228, 231, 233
Horn v. Medical Marijuana, Inc., No. 15-CV-701-FPG, 1-2 (W.D.N.Y. April 17, 2019)............. 306
Hughes v. State, 346 S.C. 554, 552 S.E.2d 315 (2001)................................................................... 134
Humboldt Cnty. v. Lang, 763 P.2d 56 (Nev. 1988)........................................................................... 90
Hunter v. Staples, 335 S.C. 93, 515 S.E.2d 261 (Ct. App. 1999)....................................259, 261-262
Iannelli v. United States, 420 U.S. 770, 95 S. Ct. 1284, 43 L. Ed. 2d 616 (1975).................. 107, 113
Illinois v. Vitale, 447 U.S. 410, 110 S. Ct. 2260, 65 L. Ed. 228 (1980)............................................ 81
In re Arisha K.S., 331 S.C. 288, 501 S.E.2d 128 (Ct. App. 1998).................................................. 200
In re Corey B., 291 S.C. 108, 352 S.E.2d 470 (1987)..............................................................200-201
In re Corey D., 339 S.C. 107, 529 S.E.2d 20 (2000)...................................................................... 198
In re Floyd, 328 S.C. 167, 492 S.E.2d 791 (1997).......................................................................... 162
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 87 S. Ct. 1428, 18 L. Ed. 2d 527 (1967)...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting