Table of Cases
Jurisdiction | Washington |
TABLE OF CASES
This table lists cases cited in the deskbook. Washington state cases are listed first. Cases from other states are listed next in alphabetical order by jurisdiction. These are followed by federal court cases. Miscellaneous categories are listed last. Each citation is followed by a colon and the section(s) in the chapter(s) of the deskbook in which the citation is found.
WASHINGTON
A____________________________________________________________________
Absher Constr. Co. v. Kent Sch. Dist., 79 Wn. App. 841, 917 P.2d 1086 (1995): 3.3(1)(a), 3.4(3), 8.4(5)
AGM, In re Settlement/Guardianship of, 154 Wn. App. 58, 223 P.3d 1276 (2010): 3.5(3)
Am. States Ins. Co. ex rel. Kommavongsa v. Nammathao, 153 Wn. App. 461, 220 P.3d 1283 (2009): 9.3(2)
Amoss v. Univ. of Wash., 40 Wn. App. 666, 700 P.2d 350 (1985): 13.3(2)(a), 13.3(3)(a)
Ang v. Martin, 154 Wn.2d 477, 114 P.3d 637 (2005): 14.2
Anschell (Anschell I), In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 141 Wn.2d 593, 9 P.3d 193 (2000): 8.2(1)
Anschell (Anschell II), In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 149 Wn.2d 484, 69 P.3d 844 (2003): 8.2(1), 11.4(8)
Arden v. Forsberg & Umlauf, P.S., 189 Wn.2d 315, 402 P.3d 245 (2017): 10.3(5)
Arden v. Forsberg & Umlauf, P.S., 193 Wn. App. 731, 373 P.3d 320, review granted, 186 Wn.2d 1009 (2016): 14.2(2)
Aubin v. Barton, 123 Wn. App. 592, 98 P.3d 126 (2004): 14.2(4)
Ausler v. Ramsey, 73 Wn. App. 231, 868 P.2d 877 (1994): 3.5(2), 3.7(4)(b)
B____________________________________________________________________
Barbee v. Luong Firm, 126 Wn. App. 148, 107 P.3d 762 (2005): 9.3(2)
Barr v. Day, 124 Wn.2d 318, 879 P.2d 912 (1994): 3.7(3), 6.3(3)(b), 14.3
Beckman v. Wilcox, 96 Wn. App. 355, 979 P.2d 890 (1999): 3.4(3)
Behnke v. Ahrens, 172 Wn. App. 281, 294 P.3d 729 (2012), review denied, 177 Wn.2d 1003 (2013): 14.3(2), 14.4(1)
Belli v. Shaw, 29 Wn. App. 875, 631 P.2d 980 (1981), aff'd,98 Wn.2d 569, 657 P.2d 315 (1983): 1.2(3), 2.3(1)(b)
Berryman v. Metcalf, 177 Wn. App. 644, 312 P.3d 745 (2013): 3.4(3), 3.4(4), 3.7(2)
Bishop v. Jefferson Title Co., 107 Wn. App. 833, 28 P.3d 802 (2001), review denied, 145 Wn.2d 1025 (2002): 14.1
Blair v. Wash. State Univ., 108 Wn.2d 558, 740 P.2d 1379 (1987): 9.5
[Page TC-1]
Blanchard, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 158 Wn.2d 317, 144 P.3d 286 (2006): 8.3(2), 15.6(3)
Boelter, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 139 Wn.2d 81, 985 P.2d 328 (1999): 3.4(4), 7.3, 7.5, 7.7(5)
Bohn v. Cody, 119 Wn.2d 357, 832 P.2d 71 (1992): 1.2(1), 1.2(2), 1.2(3), 1.2(4)(b), 1.3(2), 2.4(2), 2.4(3), 7.3(1), 10.2, 11.2(1), 12.8, 14.2(1)(a), 14.2(1)(b), 18.3
Bonet, In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against, 144 Wn.2d 502, 29 P.3d 1242 (2001): 9.5
Botimer, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 166 Wn.2d 759, 214 P.3d 133 (2009): 7.2
Bowman v. Two, 104 Wn.2d 181, 704 P.2d 140 (1985): 14.2
Brothers, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 149 Wn.2d 575, 70 P.3d 940 (2003): 3.4(4)
Brust v. Newton, 70 Wn. App. 286, 852 P.2d 1092 (1993), review denied,123 Wn.2d 1010 (1994): 14.2(3), 14.2(4), 14.2(4)(a), 14.2(4)(b)
Bullard v. Bailey, 91 Wn. App. 750, 959 P.2d 1122 (1998), review denied,137 Wn.2d 1014 (1999): 8.4(6), 14.2(3), 14.2(4)(a), 14.2(4)(b)
Burtch, In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against, 112 Wn.2d 19, 770 P.2d 174 (1989): 8.2, 8.3(2)
Bush v. O'Connor, 58 Wn. App. 138, 791 P.2d 915, review denied,115 Wn.2d 1020 (1990): 8.2, 17.5
Busk v. Flanders, 2 Wn. App. 526, 468 P.2d 695 (1970): 14.4(2)
C____________________________________________________________________
Carmick, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 146 Wn.2d 582, 48 P.3d 311 (2002): 9.4(1), 9.4(4), 12.6
Carpenter, In re Discipline of, 160 Wn.2d 16, 155 P.3d 937 (2007): 4.3(1)
Cawdrey v. Hanson Baker Ludlow Drumheller, P.S., 129 Wn. App. 810, 120 P.3d 605 (2005), review denied,157 Wn.2d 1004 (2006): 14.3(3)
Chism v. Tri-State Constr., Inc., 193 Wn. App. 818, 374 P.3d 193, review denied, 186 Wn.2d 1013 (2016): 3.3(3)
City of Seattle v. Blume, 134 Wn.2d 243, 947 P.2d 223 (1997): 14.2(4)(b)
City of Seattle v. McKenna, 172 Wn.2d 551, 259 P.3d 1087 (2011): 13.3(1)(a)
Clark Cnty. Fire Dist. No. 5 v. Bullivant Houser Bailey, P.C., 180 Wn. App. 689, 324 P.3d 743, review denied sub nom. Am. Alt. Ins. Corp. v. Bullivant Houser Bailey, P.C., 181 Wn.2d 1008 (2014): 10.3(5), 14.2(2)
Cohen, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 149 Wn.2d 323, 67 P.3d 1086 (2003): 3.4(4)
Cohen, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 150 Wn.2d 744, 82 P.3d 224 (2004): 4.3(2)
Commercial Credit v. Wollgast, 11 Wn. App. 117, 521 P.2d 1191 (1974): 3.4(3)
Cotton v. Kronenberg, 111 Wn. App. 258, 44 P.3d 878 (2002), review denied, 148 Wn.2d 1011 (2003): 2.3(2), 3.3(2)(d), 3.4(2), 3.6, 11.4(1), 14.4(1)
Crane Co. v. Paul, 15 Wn. App. 212, 548 P.2d 337 (1976): 3.7(4)(d)(i)
[Page TC-2]
Cruz v. Chavez, 186 Wn. App. 913, 347 P.3d 912 (2015): 9.4(4)
D____________________________________________________________________
Dailey v. Testone, 72 Wn.2d 662, 435 P.2d 24 (1967): 3.5(2)
Dann, In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against, 136 Wn.2d 67, 960 P.2d 416 (1998): 3.7(1)
Danzig v. Danzig, 79 Wn. App. 612, 904 P.2d 312 (1995), review denied,129 Wn.2d 1011 (1996): 2.3(1)(b)
Daugert v. Pappas, 104 Wn.2d 254, 704 P.2d 600 (1985): 14.2(4), 14.2(4)(a), 14.2(4)(b)
Davis v. Davis Wright Tremaine, L.L.P., 103 Wn. App. 638, 14 P.3d 146 (2000), review denied, 147 Wn.2d 1019 (2001): 2.4(3), 14.4(2)
DeRuiz, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 152 Wn.2d 558, 99 P.3d 881 (2004): 4.6
Dietz v. Doe, 131 Wn.2d 835, 935 P.2d 611 (1997): 7.2, 7.7(6)
Dixon v. Crawford, McGilliard, Peterson & Yelish, 163 Wn. App. 912, 262 P.3d 108 (2011), review denied, 173 Wn.2d 1015 (2012): 6.4
Doctors Co. v. Bennett Bigelow & Leedom, P.S., 187 Wn. App. 1034, No. 72163-1-I, 2015 WL 3385264 (May 26, 2015): 1.3(2)
Dynan, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 152 Wn.2d 601, 98 P.3d 444 (2004): 3.7(1), 9.1
E____________________________________________________________________
Egger, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 152 Wn.2d 393, 98 P.3d 477 (2004): 1.2(1), 1.2(2), 1.2(3), 7.3(1), 14.2(1)(a)
Engstrom v. Goodman, 166 Wn. App. 905, 271 P.3d 959, review denied, 175 Wn.2d 1004 (2012): 9.4(4), 9.6(1)
Eriks v. Denver, 118 Wn.2d 451, 824 P.2d 1207 (1992): 2.4(3), 3.6, 11.1, 14.2, 14.2(2), 14.4(1), 14.4(3)
Estate of Treadwell ex rel. Neil v. Wright, 115 Wn. App. 238, 61 P.3d 1214, review denied, 149 Wn.2d 1035 (2003): 14.2(1)(b)
Eugster, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 166 Wn.2d 293, 209 P.3d 435 (2009): 7.7(9), 19.5(2)
F____________________________________________________________________
Falkner v. Foshaug, 108 Wn. App. 113, 29 P.3d 771 (2001): 14.2
Fechner v. Volyn, 3 Wn. App. 2d 716, 418 P.3d 120 (2018): 1.2(1)
Felice, In re, 112 Wn.2d 520, 772 P.2d 505 (1989): 8.3(1)
Firestorm 1991, In re, 129 Wn.2d 130, 916 P.2d 411 (1996): 9.2(2), 9.2(4)
First Small Bus. Inv. Co. of Cal. v. Intercapital Corp. of Or., 108 Wn.2d 324, 738 P.2d 263 (1987): 11.5(3)
Flint v. Hart, 82 Wn. App. 209, 917 P.2d 590 (1996): 14.2(3), 14.2(4)(a)
Foss Maritime Co. v. Brandewiede, 190 Wn. App. 186, 359 P.3d 905 (2015), review denied, 185 Wn.2d 1012 (2016): 9.2(4)
[Page TC-3]
French v. Gabriel, 116 Wn.2d 584, 806 P.2d 1234 (1991): 14.3(3)
Fuqua v. Fuqua, 88 Wn.2d 100, 558 P.2d 801 (1977): 3.7(4)(e)(ii)
G____________________________________________________________________
Garner v. Cherberg, 111 Wn.2d 811, 765 P.2d 1284 (1988): 13.3(2)(a)
Gillingham, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 126 Wn.2d 454, 896 P.2d 656 (1995): 11.4(1)
Goldmark v. McKenna, 172 Wn.2d 568, 259 P.3d 1095 (2011): 10.3(3), 13.3(1)(a)
Gold Seal Chinchillas, Inc. v. State, 69 Wn.2d 828, 420 P.2d 698 (1966): 13.3(7)(a)
Gomez, In re Personal Restraint of, 180 Wn.2d 337, 325 P.3d 142 (2014): 21.3(6), 21.4
Gottstein v. Harrington, 25 Wash. 508, 65 P. 753 (1901): 3.7(4)(d)(iii), 6.3(4)(c)
Greenlee, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 158 Wn.2d 259, 143 P.3d 807 (2006): 14.3
Griswold v. Kilpatrick, 107 Wn. App. 757, 27 P.3d 246 (2001): 14.2(4)(b)
Grubb, In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against, 99 Wn.2d 690, 663 P.2d 1346 (1983): 3.3(2)(d)
H____________________________________________________________________
Hahn v. Boeing Co., 95 Wn.2d 28, 621 P.2d 1263 (1980): 2.2, 17.4(1)
Haley, In re Disiplinary Proceeding Against, 156 Wn.2d 324, 126 P.3d 1262 (2006): 9.4(1), 9.4(4), 9.6(1)
Hall, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 180 Wn.2d 821, 329 P.3d 870 (2014): 3.4(4), 4.6, 11.4(3)
Hallman v. Sturm Ruger & Co., 31 Wn. App. 50, 639 P.2d 805 (1982): 17.4(1)
Halverson, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 140 Wn.2d 475, 998 P.2d 833 (2000): 11.4(8)
Halvorsen v. Ferguson, 46 Wn. App. 708, 735 P.2d 675 (1986), review denied, 108 Wn.2d 1008 (1987): 14.2(4)(b)
Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title Ins. Co., 105 Wn.2d 778, 719 P.2d 531 (1986): 14.4(3)
Hankin, In re, 116 Wn.2d 293, 804 P.2d 30 (1991): 17.1
Hansen v. Wightman, 14 Wn. App. 78, 538 P.2d 1238 (1975): 14.2, 14.2(2), 14.2(3), 14.3(1), 14.3(2)
Harris v. Griffith, 2 Wn. App. 2d 638, 413 P.3d 51 (2018): 1.2(3), 12.2(4)
Harris v. Pierce County, 84 Wn. App. 222, 928 P.2d 1111 (1996): 13.3(2)(a)
Haskell, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 136 Wn.2d 300, 960 P.2d 813 (1998): 3.7(1)
Heard, In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against, 136 Wn.2d 405, 963 P.2d 818 (1998): 3.3(2)(d), 8.2(3), 12.3
Herring v. Dep't of Social & Health Servs., 81 Wn. App. 1, 914 P.2d 67 (1996): 3.4(3)
[Page TC-4]
Hetzel v. Parks, 93 Wn. App. 929, 971 P.2d 115 (1999): 1.3(2), 14.2(1)(b), 14.2(2), 14.4(1)
Hicks v. Edwards, 75 Wn. App. 156, 876 P.2d 953 (1994), review denied,125 Wn.2d 1015 (1995): 10.3(1)
Hines v. Data Line Sys., Inc., 114 Wn.2d 127, 787 P.2d 8 (1990): 14.4
Hipple v. McFadden, 161 Wn. App. 550, 255 P.3d 730, review denied, 172 Wn.2d 1009 (2011): 10.2, 14.3(3)
Hizey v. Carpenter, 119 Wn.2d 251, 830 P.2d 646 (1992): 14.2, 14.2(1)(a), 14.2(2), 14.3(1), 14.4(1)
Holman v. Coie, 11 Wn. App. 195, 522 P.2d 515, review denied, 84 Wn.2d 1011 (1974), cert....
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
