Symptoms and Stereotypes: Perceptions and Responses to Covid-19 in Malawi and Zambia

Published date01 October 2023
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/00104140231152753
AuthorKaren E. Ferree,Boniface Dulani,Adam S. Harris,Kristen Kao,Ellen Lust,Cecilia Ahsan Jansson,Erica Ann Metheney
Date01 October 2023
Subject MatterArticles
Article
Comparative Political Studies
2023, Vol. 56(12) 17951823
© The Author(s) 2023
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/00104140231152753
journals.sagepub.com/home/cps
Symptoms and
Stereotypes: Perceptions
and Responses to
Covid-19 in Malawi and
Zambia
Karen E. Ferree
1
, Boniface Dulani
2
, Adam S. Harris
3
,
Kristen Kao
4
, Ellen Lust
4
, Cecilia Ahsan Jansson
4
,
and Erica Ann Metheney
4
Abstract
A large literature documents Covid-19s health and economic effects. We
focus instead on its political impact and its potential to exacerbate identity
divisions, in particular. Psychologists argue that contagious disease increases
threat perceptions and provokes policing of group boundaries. We explore
how insider-outsider status and symptoms of illness shape perceptions of
infection, reported willingness to help, and desire to restrict free movement
of an ailing neighbor using a phone-based survey experiment administered
three times in two neighboring African countries during different stages of the
pandemic: Malawi, from May 5 to June 2, 2020 (n= 4,641); Zambia, from July 2
to August 13, 2020 (n= 2,198); and Malawi again, from March 9 to May 1, 2021
(n= 4,356). We study identities that are salient in Malawi and Zambia but have
not induced signif‌icant prior violence, making our study a relatively hard test
of disease threat theories. We f‌ind that symptoms more strongly shape
1
University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
2
University of Malawi, Malawi
3
University College London, UK
4
University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Corresponding Author:
Karen E. Ferree, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-
0521, USA.
Email: keferree@ucsd.edu
perceptions and projected behavior than insider-outsider status in both
countries and across time, suggesting that there are limits to the ability of
pandemics to independently provoke identity politics de novo.
Keywords
health politics, social policy, health policy, Covid-19, disease threat, prejudice,
stereotypes
Introduction
A large and growing literature documents Covid-19s catastrophic health and
economic effects. In this article, we focus on its political effects, in particular
the potential for Covid-19 to exacerbate identity group divisions. Research on
epidemics by psychologists (Schaller, 2011) and political scientists (Aarøe
et al., 2017;Adida et al., 2018;Albertson & Gadarian, 2015;Arriola &
Grossman, 2021;Casey, 2015;Dionne & Turkmen, 2020;Kam, 2019;
Lieberman, 2007;Onoma, 2020) suggests that Covid-19 could intensify
group conf‌lict and lead to greater discrimination against racial minorities and
those viewed as foreign.We consider a mechanism underlying this work:
the emergence of disease-based stereotypes around insider-outsider identities.
Stereotypes precede and enable discriminatory behaviors and the stigmatizing
of groups as bearers of disease. We pay particular attention to how insider-
outsider identities and symptoms shape perceptions of who carries disease and
behavioral responses to perceived disease threat. Earlier research suggests that
disease threat may not ref‌lect epidemiological data and actual risk of infection,
with individuals dismissing or ignoring symptoms of insiders while associ-
ating disease with outsiders even when symptoms are absent (Dionne &
Turkmen, 2020;Harell & Lieberman, 2021;Lieberman, 2009;Onoma, 2020).
The relationship between identity and symptoms seems particularly important
in the case of Covid-19, a disease often transmitted through asymptomatic
individuals. A core contribution of our work is therefore to explore how
symptoms and stereotypes shape perceptions about and reactions to disease.
We examine the emergence of stereotypes through a phone-based survey
experiment administered three times in two neighboring African countries
during the pandemic in 2020 and 2021: Malawi, from May to June 2020 (n=
4,641); Zambia, from July to August 2020 (n= 2,198); and Malawi again,
from March to May 2021 (n= 4,356). Our surveys occurred at different stages
of the pandemic, ranging from very early, when cases were low, to advanced,
when the disease had spread extensively. This staggered survey design enables
us to examine how time shaped responses in two frequently compared, de-
veloping countries that share a border and many common characteristics. To
1796 Comparative Political Studies 56(12)

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT