Surrogacy, Identity, Parentage and Childrenʼs Rights – Through the Eyes of a Child

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12554
AuthorJudge Alexandra Harland
Date01 January 2021
Published date01 January 2021
SURROGACY, IDENTITY, PARENTAGE AND CHILDRENʼS
RIGHTS THROUGH THE EYES OF A CHILD
Judge Alexandra Harland
In this article I will focus on two important aspects of childrens rights which are impacted by artif‌icial reproductive technol-
ogy (particularly surrogacy); being the rights to identity and the rights to legal parentage. The United Nations Convention on
the Rights of the Child acknowledges the importance of a childs right to identity, to be protected from discrimination on the
basis of the status or beliefs of the childsparents, legal guardians or family members. For many children born through surro-
gacy arrangements, they may have only one or no legally recognized parent. The adults caring for them may have parental
responsibility orders but this falls well short of providing children with the benef‌its and protections that legal parentage does.
The issue of identity can be complex. Increasingly, states have recognized the importance of children knowing the circum-
stances of their birth and being able to access biological and genetic information including medical information. From a chi-
lds perspective the issues of identity and parenthood are intertwined. Given the importance of identity, more needs to be
done to ensure that identifying information about children born as a result of artif‌icial reproductive technology is properly
stored and readily accessible for these children. Denying a child legal parentage when there are no concerns about the care
being provided by their parents cannot be justif‌ied when considered from a childrensrights perspective.
PractitionersKey Points:
The Convention on the Rights of the Child recognizes the importance of the childrens rights to identity and family.
Children born through artif‌icial reproductive technologies including surrogacy are often denied legal parents and the
recognition of their family.
There is a tension between balancing the childrens rights to identity with a donors rights to privacy and the accessi-
bility of accurate information.
The concept and recognition of legal parenthood goes beyond legal entitlements and is more expansive than parental
responsibility.
Keywords: Assisted Reproductive Technology; Europes to Surrogacy and ChildParent Relationship; Legal Parenthood;
Legal Recognition of Family;Rights to Identity; Status of Children; Surrogacy.
I. INTRODUCTION
In 2019, the United Nations Convention of the Rights of the Child (CRC) had its thirtieth anni-
versary. In recent years there has been greater discussion and recognition of childrenʼs rights.
1
Arti-
cles 2, 7 and 8 of the CRC are of particular importance to this discussion. Article 2 addresses
protecting children from all forms of discrimination and specif‌ically refers to discrimination on the
basis of birth and national, ethnic or social origins of the child or the childʼs parents, guardians or
family members. Article 7 requires a childʼs birth to be registered immediately after birth; the right
to a name; nationality; a right to know and be cared for by that childʼs parents as far as possible.
Article 8 requires states to protect the childʼs rights to identity, which includes nationality, name
and family relations. The wording of the CRC is clear. It is about the rights of individual children,
not children as a group.
Judge, Federal Circuit Court of Australia. The views expressed in this article are my own and do not ref‌lect the views
of the court.
FAMILY COURT REVIEW, Vol. 59 No. 1, January 2021 121130, doi: 10.1111/fcre.12554
© 2021 Association of Family and Conciliation Courts

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT