Supreme Court Digest: Oct. 16, 2019.

Byline: admin

Civil

Damages

Collateral Sources

After her car struck a school bus that failed to yield at an intersection, respondent brought a suit against the bus driver and the owner of the bus, appellants. Respondent was a medical-assistance enrollee, and her medical expenses were covered by two managed-care organizations that contracted with Minnesota's Prepaid Medical Assistance Plan under Minnesota's Medicaid program. After a trial, the jury awarded respondent damages, but the District Court deducted from the award the amount of discounts negotiated by respondent's managed-care organizations. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the discounts were excepted from offset because they were "payments made pursuant to the United States Social Security Act," under Minn. Stat. 548.251, subd. 1(2).

The Supreme Court held that (1) discounts negotiated by managed-care organizations under Minnesota's Prepaid Medical Assistance Plan are "payments made pursuant to the United States Social Security Act" and therefore are not deducted from the jury's damages award under the collateral-source statute; and (2) the Legislature intended to displace the common-law collateral-source rule for medical insurance payments and thus the common law cannot be used to reduce the jury's damages award. Affirmed.

A18-0121 Getz v. Peace (Court of Appeals)

Municipalities

Referenda

At issue here was whether the District Court erred in directing the City of Saint Paul to put a referendum question, regarding the city's ordinance that established organized waste collection in the city, on the ballot for the next municipal...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT