The Supply and Demand Shifts in Policing at the Start of the Pandemic: A National Multi-Wave Survey of the Impacts of COVID-19 on American Law Enforcement

Published date01 December 2023
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/10986111221148217
AuthorCynthia Lum,Carl Maupin,Megan Stoltz
Date01 December 2023
Subject MatterArticles
Article
Police Quarterly
2023, Vol. 26(4) 495519
© The Author(s) 2022
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/10986111221148217
journals.sagepub.com/home/pqx
The Supply and Demand Shifts
in Policing at the Start of the
Pandemic: A National
Multi-Wave Survey of the
Impacts of COVID-19 on
American Law Enforcement
Cynthia Lum
1
, Carl Maupin
2
, and Megan Stoltz
2
Abstract
We report the results of the only multi-wave survey of alarge and geographically diverse
sample of police agencies across the UnitedStates to understand the immediate impacts
of the COVID-19pandemic on law enforcement. Findingsindicate an unprecedentedand
sustained shift in both the supply of and demand for police services during that time.
While overall calls for service (demand) tended to decline in most agencies, some
experienced increases in specif‌ic categoriesof calls. During the early months of COVID,
agencies also reduced their in-person response to calls for service, arrests, proactive
policing, and community policing activities (supply). These f‌indings indicate a substantial
change in thepublic safety landscape duringthat time, which was experiencedby agencies
of all sizes and from all types of jurisdictions. We explore how public health pandemics
can lead to substantial, immediate, and potentially sustained changes to police deploy-
ment and police-community interactions that may impact public safety goals.
Keywords
COVID, police, calls for service, proactive policing, community policing
1
Department of Criminology, Law and Society, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
2
Professional Development and Engagement, International Association of Chiefs of Police, Alexandria, VA,
USA
Corresponding Author:
Cynthia Lum, Department of Criminology, Law and Society, George Mason University, 4400 University
Drive, MS 6D12, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
Email: clum@gmu.edu
The year 2020 will historically be remembered as when the highly contagious SARS-
CoV-2 virus, commonly known as COVID-19, infected the world. As early as January
17, 2020, the f‌irst reported case of COVID-19 in the United States emerged in the state
of Washington. By the end of January 2020, the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human
Services declared the virus a public health emergency. The number and spread of cases
began accelerating at the end of February 2020. On March 11, 2020, COVID-19 was
off‌icially declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. On March 13, then-
U.S. President Trump declared a national emergency, and by the end of March 2020,
deaths from COVID-19 had begun exponentially increasing. By early April, at least 42
states had implemented stay-at-home orders and social distancing guidance.
1
In over
two-and-a-half years in the United States alone, there have been over 97.6 million
reported cases of COVID-19 infections and over 1 million deaths.
2
In 2021 (as in
2020), COVID-19 was the third leading cause of death in the United States, behind
heart disease and cancer.
3
As a pandemic and public health crisis, COVID-19 has been
one of the worst infectious diseases modern humanity has known.
COVID-19 and its related public health emergency declarations led to dramatic
changes in everyday life. With reductions and shutdowns in public and private ac-
tivities, people began sheltering indoors, working and schooling from home, and
venturing outside sparingly for supplies. Transportation and tourism came to a standstill
with satellite images showing entire highways and cities void of vehicle and pedestrian
traff‌ic. Hospitals, nursing homes, and morgues bore the brunt of the immediate impact
of COVID, overwhelmed by sickness and death. Throughout 2020, there would be
dramatic shifts in employment and commerce, from lost jobs to how people labored.
The pandemic and its response further exacerbated pre-existing social inequalities that
have been well documented, including racial and ethnic disparities (see the systematic
review by Mude et al., 2021),
4
gender inequality (Fisher & Ryan, 2021;Mooi-Reci &
Risman, 2021), and relatedly, socio-economic disparities (Clouston et al., 2021;Fiske
et al., 2022). Deteriorating mental health, drug use, alcoholism, and overdoses were
additional consequences of these social changes (Czeisler et al., 2021;Linas et al.,
2021;Martellucci et al., 2021).
The signif‌icant impact of the pandemic on every aspect of life included unprece-
dented changes in the criminal justice system (for an overview, see National
Commission on COVID-19 and Criminal Justice, 2020). For example, because of
social distancing guidance and the risk of contagion and death, court services attempted
to reduce person-to-person contact and postponed hearings and trials,
5
leading to
extensive downstream backlog impacts and changes in court operations (Baldwin et al.,
2020;Chan, 2021;Godfrey et al., 2022;Jurva, 2021;Witte & Berman, 2021). Cor-
rectional systems also adjusted, attempting to restrict intake and hasten release to
reduce the incarcerated population and alleviate the spread of COVID-19 in con-
f‌inement (Carson et al., 2022;Hawks et al., 2020;Marcum, 2020).
6
Parole and
probation supervision and treatment services were also affected, with off‌icers and
providers unable to meet with their clients (Schwalbe & Koetzle, 2021;Viglione et al.,
2020).
496 Police Quarterly 26(4)

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT