Potential areas suitable for resolution through extension of the "APA" process to domestic issues.

PositionAdvanced Pricing Agreement

On November 25, 1992, Tax Executives Institute submitted the following comments to the Internal Re possibility of extending the Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) approach (which is now used solely in t to the resolution of domestic tax issues. The Institute's comments were made in response to an invit Triplett, Special Assistant to the IRS Chief Counsel. TEI's comments were submitted under the aegis Committee, whose chair is David F. Nitschke of Amerada Hess Corporation, and its Administrative Affa chair is W. Remi Taylor of Duke Power Co. I. Asset Basis Determination

  1. Purchase and sale of assets -- especially in the

    context of the sale of an entire business unit regardless

    of the form of the transaction as an asset

    or stock purchase and sale agreement.

    1. Agreement concerning the fair market value of

    tangible and intangible assets acquired or sold under sections 1060(a) or 338(a)(1). 2. Agreement concerning the allocation of the purchase

    price among the target assets under section 338(b)(5). 3. Agreement concerning the amount of liabilities

    assumed for purposes of determining the purchase price under 338(b)(1) and (2) and 1060(a). 4. Agreement concerning the allocation of sales proceeds

    and acquisition or disposition transaction costs for proper determination of gain or loss. B. The allocation of optional basis adjustments for

    partnership property under sections 734 and 754.

  2. The determination of whether amounts incurred

    for repairs or remediation costs are properly capitalized

    or deducted. (INDOPCO-related issues.)

  3. The allocation of costs between section 1245 and

    1250 property on major plant or building construction

    particularly where an independent evaluation

    is obtained. II. Assuming that legislation is not enacted, a

    determination of the useful life of various

    categories of intangible assets. III. Methods of computing section 263A costs.

  4. The determination of all allocable direct or indirect

    costs under section 263A(a)(2)(B) (a general

    ledger account-by-account analysis). After the determination

    is made, the government and taxpayer

    would enter into an agreement to determine a "loading

    rate" (a percentage or factor amount) to apply

    to the year-end inventory amount to arrive at the

    book-to-tax adjustment for additional costs to be

    capitalized. The loading rate agreement would

    remain in force for three to five years and then be

    reanalyzed.

  5. The determination of permissible inventory methods

    under section 263A(e)(5).

  6. The method of...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT