Succeeding as a trial lawyer: a personal account
Author | Stewart Edelstein |
Pages | 291-306 |
291
CHAPTER FOURTEEN
SUCCEEDING AS A
TRIAL LAWYER: A
PERSONAL ACCOUNT
The insights in th is book are from my own professional and personal
experience, although, as I make clear in my “But For” acknowledg-
ments, many other people made this book possible. Even so, I intention-
ally omitted from ot her chapters of this book any account of my own
journey as a trial law yer.
In this chapter, I tell you my own story, not out of shameless self-
indulgence, but rather in the hope that you will learn something va lu-
able, enabling you to assimilate everything else in this book in the
context of one trial lawyer’s experience. I certainly don’t hold myself
up as a model of the quintessential tr ial lawyer, but I have learned a few
things wort h sharing over nearly 40 years i n practice. We’ll start with
my disastrous fi rst court appearance. . . .
I join Cohen and Wolf PC in Bridgeport, Connecticut, as an as soci-
ate, right out of law school, doing legal research and writing. The firm
has a tradition—a r ite of passage, really—t hat as soon as a new associate
passes the bar, off to court to arg ue a motion. Diligently, I prepare for
my first oral argument of a pretrial motion as I did when I was on Cor-
nell Law School’s moot court team. I learn t he issues, the facts, the law,
ede88012_14_c14_p291-306.indd 291ede88012_14_c14_p291-306.indd 291 2/20/13 4:10 PM2/20/13 4:10 PM
292 | H S T L
and the procedural r ules; prepare what I will say; and am eager to argue.
I enter the large courtroom, for t he weekly call of pretria l motions. It
seems that the entire Bridgeport litigation bar is present.
My case is one of the first called. I stride confidently to the f ront
of the courtroom, secure in the knowledge that my thorough prepara-
tion, and the rightness of my position, will trump opposing counsel’s
far greater experience as a trial lawyer. As I am about to launch into
my argument, Judge Irv ing Levine, who looks like a wizened, curmud-
geonly judge straight out of typecasting, peers down at me, and this
colloquy ensues:
“New to the bar, are you?”
“Yes, your honor.”
“Welcome to the bar, son. Have you read the most recent revisions to
the rules of pract ice, which went into effect last month?”
“I believe so, your honor, but you may be referring to a rule change I
am not aware of.”
“You’re right about that. I’m denying your motion. Go back to your
office and read the updated r ules.”
“Thank you, your honor.”
“What are you thanking me for? I just denied your motion!”
Laughter fills the court room. With my tail between my legs, embar-
rassed that my first court appearance is such a disaster, I return to the
office, immediately explain what happened to the partner who assigned
this simple but ill-fated task to me. He responds with great understand-
ing and support, without castigation. Whenever associates at my firm
wonder why I stress so much keeping abreast of the latest rules change s,
I tell them that story.
And now for some context, let’s venture back to my college days.
It’s my senior year at Oberlin College, where I am an English
major. For many reasons, Oberlin is the ideal college for me. I develop
a facility for critical thinking across a range of disciplines in the liberal
arts cur riculum, and the ability to write cogent, analy tical prose. As
ede88012_14_c14_p291-306.indd 292ede88012_14_c14_p291-306.indd 292 2/20/13 4:10 PM2/20/13 4:10 PM
To continue reading
Request your trial