Structural transformation—Income inequality nexus in Africa: Does the Developer's dilemma hold?

Published date01 May 2021
AuthorMuazu Ibrahim,Xuan Vinh Vo,Olufemi Adewale Aluko
Date01 May 2021
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2194
ACADEMIC PAPER
Structural transformationIncome inequality nexus in Africa:
Does the Developer's dilemma hold?
Muazu Ibrahim
1,2
| Xuan Vinh Vo
1,3
| Olufemi Adewale Aluko
4
1
Institute of Business Research, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
2
School of Business and Law, Department of Banking and Finance, University for Development Studies, Wa, Ghana
3
CFVG, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
4
Department of Finance, University of Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria
Correspondence
Muazu Ibrahim, School of Business and Law,
Department of Banking and Finance,
University for Development Studies, Wa,
Upper West region, Ghana.
Email: imuazu@uds.edu.gh
Funding information
This study was funded by the University of
Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh
City, Vietnam
This article examines the developer's dilemmaa seeming quandary emerging from
the fact that developing countries simultaneously pursue two different developmen-
tal goals: (a) seeking economic development through structural transformation and
(b) reducing income inequality. However, the proclivity of increasing income inequal-
ity while pursuing structural transformation is often referred to as the developer's
dilemma. This study investigates for the presence of this dilemma in Africa using sam-
ple splitting and threshold estimation technique. While we find support for the exis-
tence of a developer's dilemma, suggesting that structural transformation induces
income inequality, the income inequality-widening effect is disproportionate.
1|INTRODUCTION
In a groundbreaking research, Kuznets (1973) argues that structural
transformation, which involves the redistribution of resources within
and between sectors, is one of the basic characteristics of modern
economic development. Most countries witness structural transfor-
mation during economic stagnation or recession regimes (Bah, 2011).
Admittedly, structural transformation is germane for economic devel-
opment. However, structural transformation may be inimical, particu-
larly for developing countries. Developing countries simultaneously
pursue economic development via structural transformation and inclu-
sive growth-reduction of income inequality, which causes a distribu-
tional tension known as developer's dilemma (Sumner, 2017).
Kuznets (1955), using a dual economy model, argues that income
inequality rises in the early stages of economic development following
structural transformation. Recently, Baek (2017) states that structural
transformation is not always associated with inclusive growth or pros-
perity for all as it may exacerbate inequalities.
Understanding the developer's dilemma requires a knowledge of
how structural transformation and income inequality are associated
(Sumner, 2017).
1
We provide empirical insight into the developer's
dilemma by examining the impact of structural transformation on
income inequality in Africa. We add novelty to literature in three
ways. First, our article is the first empirical attempt at understanding
the developer's dilemma in Africa. We consider Africa as a good case
to study because it is often characterized by low-economic productiv-
ity and high-income inequality. Second, we adopt a threshold regres-
sion model which allows us to discover whether the developer's
dilemma holds in countries with low and high structural transforma-
tion. Last, we use a novel index of structural transformation along
with three different measures of income inequality and this permits us
to determine whether the developer's dilemma is sensitive to the
measure of income inequality.
2
2|METHODOLOGY
2.1 |Data
We use annual data for 24 African countries for the period spanning
20002014 in examining the relationship between structural transforma-
tion and income inequality. These countries are Benin, Botswana,
Burkina Faso, Chad, Congo Republic, Cote d'Ivoire, Egypt, Gabon, The
Gambia, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania,
Received: 14 April 2020 Revised: 11 May 2020 Accepted: 15 May 2020
DOI: 10.1002/pa.2194
J Public Affairs. 2021;21:e2194. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/pa © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 1of7
https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2194

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex