Strengthening the Role of Unmarried Fathers: Findings from the Co‐Parent Court Project

Published date01 December 2015
AuthorDylan L. Galos,Mary S. Marczak,Ebony Ruhland,Alisha M. Hardman,Emily H. Becher
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12134
Date01 December 2015
Strengthening the Role of Unmarried Fathers:
Findings from the Co-Parent Court Project
MARY S. MARCZAK*
EMILY H. BECHER*
ALISHA M. HARDMAN
DYLAN L. GALOS
EBONY RUHLAND
§
While the importance of fathers in unmarried coparent families is a strong area of social
and political interest, a dearth of community-based interventions exis ts for supporting the
role of fathers in at-risk families. The Co-Parent Court (CPC) was a 3-year demonstration
project evaluating the effectiveness of a collaborative intervention to support unmarried co-
parents establishing paternity and improving their coparenting relationships and paternal
involvement in their child’s life. A randomized-control experimental design was employed.
The paper will explore father involvement and coparent relationship outcomes.
Keywords: Co-Parent Court; Paternity Establishment; Unmarried Coparents; Fathers
Fam Proc 54:630–638, 2015
The parenting practices of fathers in families headed by unmarried coparents are a
growing area of interest, research, and intervention (Fagan, Cherson, Brown, &
Vecere, 2015; McHale, Salman, & Coovert, 2015; McHale, Waller, & Pearson, 2012; Waller,
2012). Research indicates that fathers who never married their child’s o ther parent are at
risk of growing disengaged in their parental role and showing less investment in their
child. This risk is heightened if the romantic relationship with their child’s mother termi-
nates and if the quality of their coparenting relationship with the child’s mother declines
(Tach, Mincy, & Edin, 2010; Waller, 2012). Decreased father investment is associated with
poorer outcomes for children (Carlson & Magnuson, 2011; Choi & Pyun, 2014).
There also exists a stigma regarding unmarried parents and their families. Unmarried
parents are typically seen through a deficit-based approach, and fathers in particular are
viewed through a lens of pathology. For example, Hines and Boyd-Franklin (2005)
asserted that African-American fathers are “constantly challenged with negative stereo-
types including the notion that they are absent or, at best, peripheral in their children’s
lives” (p. 91) and that they are “nonfamily-oriented or uncaring” (p. 90). An all too common
belief is that fathers are not involved in their children’s lives because they do not want to
be. An alternative perspective is that fathers are interested in being involved in their chil-
dren’s lives, but face various barriers and challenges that hinder their involvement.
Unfortunately, limited systems of intervention are in place to support positive coparenting
and father involvement between never married, nonresident fathers and their children
*University of Minnesota Extension, Twin Cities, MN.
School of Human Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS.
Epidemiology & Community Health, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, MN.
§
School of Social Work, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, MN.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Mary Marczak, 495 Coffey Hall, 1420
Eckles Ave., St. Paul, MN 55108. E-mail: marcz001@umn.edu.
630
Family Process, Vol. 54, No. 4, 2015 ©2015 Family Process Institute
doi: 10.1111/famp.12134

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT