Spencer Neth: an appreciation.

AuthorEntin, Jonathan L.
PositionCase Western Reserve University School of Law professor - Testimonial

Every successful institution needs unsung heroes. For the past thirty-nine years, Spencer Neth has been an unsung hero at Case Western Reserve University School of Law. At first glance Spencer seems unprepossessing, neither physically imposing nor especially outspoken. But, as is so often true, appearances are deceiving. Spencer is extraordinarily intelligent, literate, and thoughtful. It will take several people to fill the large shoes that he leaves behind.

Let me begin with Spencer's intellect. For the past decade he and I have been suitemates. There is a printer outside my office, so I have been able to see much of what Spencer reads simply by sorting through the printer's output. And he reads a lot, about almost everything that a legal scholar might find relevant. From commercial law to judicial administration to dispute resolution to civil rights and civil liberties to legal history and jurisprudence to computerized legal research (a field in which he was a pioneer), Spencer has encyclopedic interests. Those interests are reflected in the penetrating questions he has been asking at faculty workshops and the incisive suggestions he has offered to many colleagues over the years.

Unfortunately for the rest of us, Spencer has not published very much during his career. As a result, his intellectual legacy won't be as tangible as it deserves to be. But the relative brevity of his bibliography reflects something important about Spencer. He has many significant ideas, but he has never taken himself too seriously. Perhaps because he came to the legal academy at a time when publication expectations were more modest, he held himself to very high standards that led him to keep tinkering with very promising manuscripts instead of sending them off to law reviews.

Spencer's modesty can be tellingly illustrated in another way. Our faculty has developed a tradition of going to a colleague's final class to pay tribute to the colleague's career. When we went to Spencer's final class, we discovered that he had brought in a guest speaker. At one level, this made pedagogical sense: the speaker had experience and insights that Spencer thought would benefit his students. At another, though, this decision reflected Spencer's hesitancy to hog the limelight. He allowed the speaker to make his points and took only a few minutes at the end to conclude. I am confident that the students learned a lot more than substantive law in that course and in many of Spencer's...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT