Speak freely: limits on 'electioneering'.

AuthorSullum, Jacob
PositionCitings - Brief article

TWO FEDERAL court cases may signal the demise of laws that restrict "electioneering communications" in the name of preventing political corruption.

In May a federal judge overturned a Florida law that required any group that so much as mentioned a candidate or ballot measure in a newsletter or on a website to register with the state as an "electioneering communications organization;' file regular spending reports, and disclose its donors. Noting that "no court has ever upheld such a sweeping regulation of political speech" U.S. District Judge Stephan Mickle declined to break new ground. "While it is true that the legislature has the power to regulate elections," he wrote, "it does not have the power to regulate purely political discussions about elections."

And at the end of June, the U.S. Supreme Court scheduled a second round of oral arguments in a case involving an unflattering documentary about Hillary Clinton produced by the conservative group Citizens United. During the first round of arguments in March, several justices were openly skeptical that restrictions on the promotion and...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT