Social Mobility in Chilean Youth and Their Parents: A Generational Analysis from the Perspective of Social Reproduction

Date01 November 2021
AuthorMauricio Oyarzo,Luis Miguel Rodrigo
Published date01 November 2021
DOI10.1177/0094582X20939103
Subject MatterOther Articles
https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X20939103
LATIN AMERICAN PERSPECTIVES, Issue 241, Vol. 48 No. 6, November 2021, 120–142
DOI: 10.1177/0094582X20939103
© 2020 Latin American Perspectives
120
Social Mobility in Chilean Youth and Their Parents
A Generational Analysis from the Perspective of Social
Reproduction
by
Luis Miguel Rodrigo and Mauricio Oyarzo
Recent studies on Chile agree that the country’s youth enjoy greater social mobility
than previous generations. This has been attributed either to their greater access to higher
education or to life-cycle effects on occupation. A test of these two hypotheses by estimat-
ing the socioeconomic positions of four generations of Chileans using a model of analysis
based on the social reproduction paradigm shows that younger generations of Chileans
have a lower level of social inheritance than the rest of the population only during their
initial years in the labor market. Therefore, the greater social mobility observed in them is
temporary and is explained by life-cycle effects on occupation.
Estudios recientes sobre Chile coinciden en que la actual juventud chilena goza de una
mayor movilidad social que las generaciones anteriores. Esto se ha atribuido a su mayor
acceso a la educación superior o a los efectos del ciclo de vida en la ocupación. Aquí se
examinan estas dos hipótesis a partir de una aproximación en torno a las posiciones socio-
económicas de cuatro generaciones chilenas. Se utiliza un modelo analítico asentado en el
paradigma de la reproducción social, el cual nos muestra que las generaciones más jóvenes
tienen un grado de herencia social más bajo que el resto de la población tan sólo durante
sus primeros años como participantes en el mercado laboral. Por lo tanto, su mayor movi-
lidad social es temporal y se explica a partir de los efectos del ciclo de vida en la ocupación.
Keywords: Reproductive model, Social inheritance, Labor trajectory, Bourdieu
Various studies on Chile have shown that the income and therefore the
socioeconomic status of a younger generation of workers are less determined
by social characteristics such as social class of origin, gender, spatial position,
and ethnicity than those of previous generations (Núñez and Miranda, 2007;
Núñez and Risco, 2004; Rodrigo, 2015; Sapelli, 2009). This would suggest that
we are at the onset of a period of greater social fluidity in a society that has
historically been characterized by rigidity (Espinoza, Barozet, and Méndez,
2011; Espinoza and Núñez, 2014; Salazar and Pinto, 1999a; 1999b; 2002).
However, so far there has been little clarity regarding the lower social
Luis Miguel Rodrigo is a professor of sociology in the Department of Economics of the Universidad
Católica del Norte in Antofagasta, Chile, and director of the Regional Observatory of Human
Development. Mauricio Oyarzo is a professor of economics in the School of Business
Administration of the Universidad de Concepción Campus Chillán and a research associate at the
Instituto de Economía Aplicada Regional of the Universidad Católica del Norte. Funding pro-
vided by CONICYT FONDECYT No. 11150703 is acknowledged and appreciated.
939103LAPXXX10.1177/0094582X20939103LATIN AMERICAN PERSPECTIVESRodrigo and Oyarzo / SOCIAL MOBILITY IN CHILEAN YOUTH AND THEIR PARENTS
research-article2020
Rodrigo and Oyarzo / SOCIAL MOBILITY IN CHILEAN YOUTH AND THEIR PARENTS 121
deter mination of Chilean youth. Previous results have been explained in terms
of either the human-capital (Núñez and Risco, 2004; Sapelli, 2009; 2016) or the
life-cycle (Rodrigo, 2015) hypothesis. The human-capital hypothesis is that
younger Chileans enjoy greater access to higher education, a condition that will
not only facilitate greater intergenerational social mobility but also bring about
a permanent change in the structure of opportunities within the country. The
life-cycle hypothesis is that workers of all generations will be less affected by
their social origin at the beginnings of their career paths than in the subsequent
stages of each trajectory and therefore access to higher education has not
resulted in a change in the structure of opportunities in Chile.
This article tests these two hypotheses in order to understand whether we
are at an inflection point in terms of social fluidity in Chile. In order to do this,
we estimate the socioeconomic positions of four generations1 of Chileans
through a set of socio-statistical models based on the social reproduction para-
digm. The National Socioeconomic Characterization Survey (CASEN, 2015) is
used to track the labor trajectories of four generations of workers over nine
years (2006–2015). It is critical to understand how socioeconomic position is
achieved in Chile and particularly to what extent it is inherited and to what
extent socially determined. The prevailing belief of the population is in a meri-
tocratic society with high levels of social mobility, this being one of the main
pillars of the neoliberal model currently in place (Mayol, Azócar, and Azócar,
2013; Rodrigo, 2013). This academic discussion will therefore have obvious
political repercussions, as it is difficult to justify a socioeconomic model char-
acterized by inequality if social status is in fact inherited.
The article is divided into six sections. The first discusses our theoretical
framework. The second covers the literature regarding social mobility between
generations. The third reviews the literature on generational differences and
the level of social determination in Chile. The fourth section presents our ana-
lytical model and reviews the databases and socio-statistical models. The fifth
section shows the different levels of social determination for each generation
and the effects of each of the social characteristics considered. The final section
interprets our results.
THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
The present work can be considered an extension of Rodrigo’s (2015) study for
the case of Chile, in which a model of analysis based on the social reproduction
paradigm and especially on the theories of Bourdieu (1998; 2001; 2003) was pro-
posed. “Social position” is here understood as location in the social structures of
domination, especially within socioeconomic (social class), sociocultural (gender,
race/ethnicity), and spatial (center-periphery) relationships. Bourdieu (2001)
understands “social class” as the amount of capital—economic, cultural, social,
and symbolic—that a family has. Although one’s social class is affected by the
whole of one’s social position of origin (the one that one had during childhood-
adolescence), its principal determinant will be the social class of one’s parents.
For Bourdieu, the school system, by means of a series of operations, trans-
forms part of a family’s capital into the educational capital of its children, thus

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT