Sleeping with a broken promise: The moderating role of generativity concerns in the relationship between psychological contract breach and insomnia among older workers

AuthorValerie Caines,Prashant Bordia,Simon Lloyd D. Restubog,Patrick Raymund James M. Garcia
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/job.2222
Date01 March 2018
Published date01 March 2018
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Sleeping with a broken promise: The moderating role of
generativity concerns in the relationship between psychological
contract breach and insomnia among older workers
Patrick Raymund James M. Garcia
1
|Prashant Bordia
2
|Simon Lloyd D. Restubog
2
|
Valerie Caines
2,3
1
Centre for Sustainable HRM and Wellbeing,
Peter Faber Business School, Australian
Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
2
Research School of Management, The
Australian National University, Canberra,
Australia
3
Flinders Business, Flinders University,
Adelaide, Australia
Correspondence
Patrick Raymund James M. Garcia, Centre for
Sustainable HRM and Wellbeing, Peter Faber
Business School, Australian Catholic
University, Level 7, 250 Victoria Parade, East
Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia.
Email: patrick.garcia@acu.edu.au
Funding information
Australian Research Council, Grant/Award
Number: DP1096037
Summary
This paper examines the relationship between psychological contract breach and insomnia among
older workers (aged 40 years and up). Drawing upon the conservation of resources theory, we
conceptualize breach as a stressful event characterized by a perceived threat, failure to gain, or
actual loss of valued resources, which increases psychological distress and insomnia. Moreover,
we hypothesized that older workers' generativity concerns would act as a personal resource that
would buffer the negative impact of breach. We tested our proposed model in 2 studies (Study
1 = 123; Study 2 = 168) of employeespouse dyads. Results revealed that psychological distress
mediated the relationship between psychological contract breach and insomnia. These mediated
relationships were significant for those with low, but not for those with high levels of generativity
concerns. These effects remained significant even after controlling for perceived organizational
support (i.e., a social exchange mechanism). Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
KEYWORDS
conservation ofresources, generativity, older workers, psychological contracts
1|INTRODUCTION
The population is aging at an unprecedented rate around the world.
In the United States, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics forecasts
that by the end of 2022 one third of U.S. workers will be 55 years
old and above, compared with 27.6% in 2002 (Toossi, 2013). The
same trends are seen in developing countries such as the Philippines.
In 2010, older people made up 6.5% of the total population. This is
expected to increase to 11.5% by the year 2030 (Help Age Interna-
tional, 2014). It is anticipated that older individuals will comprise two
billion of the world's population by 2050, more than double from
841 million in 2013 (United Nations, Department of Economic and
Social Affairs, & Population Division, 2013).
An aging population also means an aging workforce, and organiza-
tions can view it as an opportunity for competitive advantage instead
of a hindrance. For instance, encouraging older workers to continue
labor participation helps address labor shortages given that there are
fewer younger workers able to replace them (Jackson, Walter,
Felmingham, & Spinaze, 2006). More importantly, organizations can
capitalize on the strengths of older workers such as their heightened
level of knowledge, skill, and experience, which has accumulated over
years of employment (Posthuma & Campion, 2008). Despite these
benefits, most organizations are illprepared to effectively retain and
manage older workers. Indeed, a study by the Society for Human
Resource Management revealed that only 4% of 1,715 organizations
surveyed reported having created specific strategies and policies in
response to an aging workforce (Society for Human Resource Manage-
ment, 2014). Retaining older workers necessitates an understanding of
their values, beliefs, and needs. More importantly, it includes consider-
ing how older workers perceive and make sense of the employment
relationship (Bal, De Lange, Jansen, & Van Der Velde, 2013; Ng &
Feldman, 2009). An important construct that captures the nature of
employeeemployer relationships is the psychological contract.
Psychological contracts are mental models that constitute the
terms and exchange agreements between the employee and the
employing organization (Rousseau, 1995). These are further charac-
terized as perceived obligations of reciprocity, which may include
promises made by the organization (such as, job security,
Received: 30 August 2015 Revised: 27 July 2017 Accepted: 1 August 2017
DOI: 10.1002/job.2222
326 Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J Organ Behav. 2018;39:326338.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/job

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT