Skilled and Unskilled Immigrants and Entrepreneurship in a Developed Country

AuthorHamid Beladi,Saibal Kar
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12155
Published date01 August 2015
Date01 August 2015
Skilled and Unskilled Immigrants and
Entrepreneurship in a Developed Country
Hamid Beladi and Saibal Kar*
Abstract
Evidence from some OECD countries suggests that skilled immigrants are over-represented in entrepre-
neurship. We offer an analytical explanation to show that it may be a direct outcome of asymmetric infor-
mation between immigrants and potential employers in the rich countries. Limiting occupational choices to
self-employment and employment, we show that skilled immigrants vis-à-vis natives may be proportionally
over-represented in small businesses. This compensates for the income loss in the labor market. It results
from higher critical risk aversion among skilled immigrants compared with natives and subsequently leads
to higher average income for all immigrants in the cross-section. Finally, we show why a lesser number of
unskilled immigrants enter self-employment and discuss the speed of income convergence between all
immigrants and natives.
1. Introduction
Available evidence suggests that a considerably large proportion of immigrants in
many rich countries becomes self-employed and participates in small business activ-
ities. For North American and West European countries, empirical estimates show
that across many immigrant groups, the self-employment rate exceeds that of native-
born (Andersson and Hammarstedt, 2010; Constant and Zimmermann, 2006; Hum
and Simpson, 2004; Clark and Drinkwater, 2000; Robson, 1998; Bates, 1997; Fairlie
and Meyer, 1996; Yuengert, 1995; Kidd, 1993; Razin, 1992).1All these studies empha-
size that immigrants are proportionally over-represented in self-employment com-
pared with natives in the host country. Borjas (1986) utilizes the 1970 and 1980 US
Census data and finds that self-employment rates are higher for immigrants than for
native-born men for six racial categories. Moreover, more recent immigrant cohorts
and persons immigrating less recently within a given cohort are more likely to be self-
employed (enclave effect). Further, a case study of Spain (Carrasco, 1999) shows that
lack of opportunities in the labor market leads to unemployed individuals being more
likely to switch into self-employment consistent with the view that the more disadvan-
taged tend to become self-employed.2
Despite this evidence and other crucial determinants such as language, ethnic
origin, cultural/colonial connections, there has been little interest in offering a theo-
retical explanation for skilled immigrants’ over-representation in self-employment.
We attempt to cover this gap by developing a simple theoretical explanation of the
available evidence, a good share of which dictates that relatively more skilled immi-
grants (to natives) end up as self-employed. In the end, we also look into the prospect
* Beladi: Economics Department, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio,
TX 78249, USA.E-mail:hamid.beladi@utsa.edu. Kar: Centre for Studies in Social Sciences, Calcutta, India
and Institute for the Study of Labor, IZA, Bonn, Germany. Saibal Kar is indebted to Eliakim Katz and
seminar participants at the Indian Statistical Institute, Calcutta, and Santa Fe Institute, USA. The authors
duly thank an anonymous reviewer for excellent comments. The usual disclaimer applies.
Review of Development Economics, 19(3), 666–682, 2015
DOI:10.1111/rode.12155
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
of how relatively unskilled immigrants perform in the host country labor market. By
modeling the occupational choice of unskilled immigrants we directly engage with the
issue of development of minority entrepreneurship in rich countries. This is expected
to have strong implications for immigrants’ economic assimilation with the natives, as
well.
The subject of self-employment among all native unskilled workers (and immi-
grants) is largely based on the subsidiary literature highlighting and reflecting on the
pattern of development among minority workers, per se. A national survey in the
USA (Roper Organization, 1987) reports that 61% of white-collar workers rated busi-
ness ownership as an excellent or good way to get ahead, as compared with 54% of
blue-collar workers. Forty-eight per cent of non-high-school graduates (the same for
blacks and whites) ranked self-employment higher than other professions, notably
wage work. Considering male high-school dropouts as the unskilled section of the
population, Balkin (1989) tabulated self-employment rate among this group across
industries. For all industries taken together [Current Population Survey (CPS), March
1987] the self-employment rate was 11.8%. Of this, agriculture, forestry and fishing
accounted for 44.4%; mining 7.2%; construction 16.9%; manufacturing 1.3%; whole-
sale trade 8.3%; retail trade 15.6%; services 16.8%; and finance, insurance and real
estate, 11%. Nevertheless, the self-employment rate for all male was considerably
greater (21% greater) than the self-employment rate of male dropouts. Even men
who finished high school had a greater participation (14%) in self-employment com-
pared with those who did not (11.8%). Bauman (1988) finds that the self-employment
rate for persons in poverty who worked full time is twice that of the self-employment
rate for the total full-time working population. However, if minorities are associated
with low-income groups (Blacks and Hispanics in the USA), then there is evidence of
less participation in self-employment.3Generous unemployment benefits may also be
responsible for low participation in self-employment among the unskilled. Low-
skilled immigrants, on the other hand, of which a considerable part may be undocu-
mented or illegal [see Winegarden and Khor (1993), for income inequality
comparison for native-born population in the USA] are not likely to be covered by
unemployment benefits or health insurance and would naturally have a high opportu-
nity cost of unemployment. Besides, wages offered to unskilled workers may still
exceed their pay-off if they have not migrated—considering that most unskilled immi-
grants originate in poor countries and could be even refugees or asylum-seekers (see
Enchantegui, 1998). Nevertheless, it is possible that the high unemployment rate
among the unskilled group, both natives and immigrants, pushes them into sup-
plementary sources of earnings such as self-employment. Overall, the evidence is
mixed and shows that controlling for similar characteristics, the self-employment rate
increases with schooling.
As a derivative of the problem of occupational choice, we show that the choice of
riskier self-employment by immigrant workers helps to promote income growth and
leads to the development of economic conditions of initially disadvantaged groups.
Both these involve measuring the ex post degree of risk aversion among immigrants
and natives. The workers according to our formulation are deemed as skilled and
unskilled types within a particular skill category. Essentially, this means that there are
both good/productive workers and bad/unproductive workers within each
professional/skill group, making the ex ante distinction costly for potential employers
in the rich country. The skill variability has previously been generalized over a contin-
uum of skill (as in Katz and Stark, 1987). In our model, the critical degree of risk aver-
sion for each group generates the distribution of individuals between employed and
IMMMIGRANTS AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP 667
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT