Should the U.S. Bring Back the Draft?

• Author: Laich, Dennis
• Position: Debate

The United States has relied on an all-volunteer army since 1973, when the military draft was abolished. But at age 18, all American men are still required to register with the Selective Service, the federal agency responsible for implementing a draft. That's in case the government decides that a draft is once again necessary to maintain America's fighting force. With the war in Afghanistan now in its 17th year, some are raising the question of whether volunteers can still meet the nation's military needs. More than 30 other countries--including Russia, Israel, and Mexico--maintain a military draft.

Below, two experts--one a retired general, the other a former congressman--weigh in on whether the U.S. should reinstate the draft.

YES

The current model of staffing our military using an all-volunteer force is unfair, inefficient, and unsustainable. The system is fundamentally unfair because it relies disproportionately on lower-income Americans, forcing them to shoulder the burdens of risk and sacrifice. Those are the people most often attracted by the economic incentives the military offers to encourage people to enlist.

Relying exclusively on volunteers essentially provides exemption from military service for Americans who have more money--and therefore more options.

An all-volunteer military is also inefficient because it can't expand and contract quickly to meet the changing requirements in the nation's defense. A draft would allow the military to quickly pull in additional troops without the cumbersome and uncertain process of recruitment. In the past 15 years, as the U.S. has simultaneously fought wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the military has been forced to deploy the same troops repeatedly. This additional stress has resulted in tens of thousands of service members suffering from PTSD, * alcohol and drug abuse, and higher rates of divorce and suicide.

The current system also won't be economically sustainable for much longer. The Pentagon has had to pay unprecedented and costly enlistment and re-enlistment bonuses to get people to join the military and to remain when their initial commitment is complete. Last year alone, the military paid $424 million in enlistment bonuses.

There's another reason for added expense: An all-volunteer force usually has greater numbers of older troops, many of whom have spouses and children who are also eligible for costly military benefits. By contrast, a drafted military force relies heavily on 18- and 19-year-olds, who tend to be single.

The U.S. should adopt a military draft that applies fairly to both men and women, with no exemptions or deferments. Doing so would be more fair, more efficient, and less expensive for the nation.

--MAJOR GENERAL DENNIS LAICH (RETIRED)

United States Army

NO

A fundamental question we must ask ourselves when thinking about the military draft or any other...