Setting Up for a Successful Project: Subcontractor Bidding Issues

AuthorBy Jennifer L. Dauer
Pages5-14
THE CONSTRUCTION LAWYER 5Winter 2020
Jennifer L. Dauer
Published in The Construction Lawyer, Volume 40, Number 1 Winter 2020. © 2020 American Bar Association. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved. This information or any portion
thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association.
Setting Up for a Successful Project: Subcontractor
Bidding Issues
By Jennifer L. Dauer
Jennifer L. Dauer is a partner at Diepenbrock Elkin Dauer
McCandless LLP in Sacramento, California.
Unlike private construc-
tion projects, public works
projects generally must be
competitively bid, allowing
all qualied contractors the
opportunity to submit a bid
and secure the contract. The
competitive bidding process
traditionally involves public
advertisement for the sub-
mission of sealed bids, the
public opening of bids, and
the award of contracts to the
lowest responsible bidder that is responsive to the solicita-
tion.
1
Bidders may be required to list the subcontractors
they expect to use on the project if awarded the contract.
In many jurisdictions, bidders must list some percentage
of subcontractors (or show good faith efforts to enlist)
who are socially disadvantaged business enterprises, such
as local businesses, woman- or minority-owned businesses,
disabled veteran business enterprises, or qualied “small”
businesses. In some of those jurisdictions, bidders are
required to use those listed subcontractors unless limited,
specied grounds for substitution exist. When federal
funding is involved, such listing and outreach to disadvan-
taged business enterprises may be required, even absent a
state or local law requiring same. Other jurisdictions, such
as California, impose subcontractor listing requirements
for all public projects above a threshold dollar value.
Bidders required to list and use subcontractors nd
themselves with additional pre-bid responsibilities at a
time when they are rushing to complete their bids and
minimize their price. At a minimum, bidders must verify
that selected subcontractors are properly licensed and
have the skill and experience to perform the work. In
addition, in instances where a bidder is unable to meet
a disadvantaged business participation requirement or
goal, it may be necessary for the bidder to demonstrate
“good faith efforts” to involve such businesses. Such efforts
must be documented, and extensive documentation may
be required when, or shortly after, the bid is submitted.
Moreover, for listed subcontractors, the bidder is often
required to show they are performing a “commercially
useful function,” which is intended to ensure that the
subcontractors are not merely an extra, superuous
participant in the transaction, listed only to win the bid.
Even where outreach to disadvantaged subcontrac-
tors is not required, the bid process can be fraught where
the bidder is required to use any listed subcontractors.
Absent a teaming agreement by a subcontractor to work
exclusively with one bidder, subcontractor bids often are
submitted only hours before the prime bid is due. Bid-
ders then are rushed to review and compare all sub-bids
in various trades and determine the most appropriate
bid. Potential subcontractors will not necessarily bid the
same scopes of work within one trade and may offer var-
ious options that change their pricing. In addition, the
sub-bids may contain terms that differ from terms in the
prime contract when awarded (e.g., payment terms that
differ from the public entity’s obligations). If a bidder
does not identify such discrepancies during bidding, it
may be bound to use a subcontractor at terms that are
different from what the bidder expected.
This article addresses common subcontractor outreach
and listing requirements, as well as subcontractor bidding
issues that arise during the pre-bid process that may have
material implications on performance if not addressed.
Subcontractor Listing Requirements—
Use of Disadvantaged Business Subcontractors
Whether under requirements on contracts that are feder-
ally funded or pursuant to state law, many public works
projects contain percentage participation goals for disad-
vantaged businesses to remedy past discrimination or to
lower barriers to underrepresented groups participating
in construction.
2
Programs supporting socially disadvan-
taged businesses frequently require bidders either to be
a disadvantaged business or to commit to use disadvan-
taged businesses for a specied percentage of the work.
Bidders may have the option to establish “good faith
efforts” to meet the goal percentage. Bidders who fail to
meet the goal or establish good faith efforts generally are
not eligible for the contract award. In addition, or in the
alternative, some public entities provide pricing prefer-
ences to bidders who are, or commit to use, disadvantaged
businesses in performing the contract. Disadvantaged
businesses frequently include businesses owned by minori-
ties, women, or veterans (sometimes disabled veterans).
Some public entities have preferences for businesses in
economically undeveloped or underdeveloped areas.
Local public entities, in particular, may award prefer-
ences to favored contractors or subcontractors located
in the awarding entity’s jurisdiction. Although types of
PRE-BID PROCESS

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT