Separation Without Exclusion in Financial Insurance

AuthorJames R. Thompson,Eric Stephens
Published date01 December 2015
Date01 December 2015
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12038
©2014 The Journal of Risk and Insurance. Vol.82, No. 4, 853–864 (2015).
DOI: 10.1111/jori.12038
Separation Without Exclusion in Financial
Insurance
Eric Stephens
James R. Thompson
Abstract
This article develops a model of linearly priced financial insurance sold by
default-prone insurers. It shows that when insurers differ in their default
probabilities there can exist equilibria in which different risk types partially
or completely self-sort into insurance contracts offered by different insurers.
Partial separation can occur when insurer default and insurance risks are un-
correlated. Full separation is possible when they are correlated. For example,
low-risk insured parties may match with higher default-risk insurers, while
high-risk insured parties match with lower default-risk insurers.
Introduction
In their seminal articles, Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976) and Wilson (1977) develop a
framework in which insurers can screen buyers through a menu of contracts wherein
low-risk individuals purchase relatively cheaper insurance than high-risk individuals
in return for less coverage. Existence of this type of separating equilibrium depends,
crucially, on the assumption that contracts are exclusive. Without exclusivity, prices
are typically assumed to be linear, and separation of risk types through a market
mechanism cannot generally be achieved.
Wedevelop a model of a market for financial insurance that contains two nonstandard
assumptions: insurance providers may default on their obligations, and pricing of
contracts is linear. We show that privately known type information can be revealed
in equilibrium, despite linear pricing. Our insured party (buyer) can be “risky” or
“safe,” with the former more likely to experience a loss. The buyer chooses how much
to insure with a stable “good” insurer versus how much to insure with an unstable
Eric Stephens is at Carleton University. Stephens can be contacted via
e-mail: eric.stephens@carleton.ca. James R. Thompson is at the University of Waterloo.
Thompson can be contacted via e-mail: james@uwaterloo.ca. We are grateful to Mike Hoy,
Casey Rothschild, Stefano Giglio, Jano Zabojnik, three anonymous referees, the editor, and
seminar participants at the 2011 Risk Theory Society (Little Rock), 2011 WFA (Santa Fe),
2011 FIRS (Sydney), University of Alberta, University of Toronto, and 2010 CEA for helpful
comments. Note that part of this article was written while Thompson was visiting the Wharton
School, which he would like to thank for its hospitality.Financial support provided by SSHRC
Grant 435-2013-0180 is gratefully acknowledged.
853

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT