Self-Determined Goals of Male Participants Attending an Intervention Program for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators: A Thematic Analysis

Published date01 October 2023
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X231170120
AuthorManuel Roldán-Pardo,Faraj A. Santirso,Cristina Expósito-Álvarez,Magaly L. García-Senlle,Enrique Gracia,Marisol Lila
Date01 October 2023
Subject MatterArticles
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X231170120
International Journal of
Offender Therapy and
Comparative Criminology
2023, Vol. 67(13-14) 1383 –1400
© The Author(s) 2023
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X231170120
journals.sagepub.com/home/ijo
Article
Self-Determined Goals of
Male Participants Attending
an Intervention Program for
Intimate Partner Violence
Perpetrators: A Thematic
Analysis
Manuel Roldán-Pardo1* , Faraj A. Santirso1,*,
Cristina Expósito-Álvarez1, Magaly L. García-Senlle1,
Enrique Gracia1, and Marisol Lila1
Abstract
Treatment adherence and motivation to change are among the main challenges in
intervention programs for Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) perpetrators. Motivational
strategies have shown promising results in increasing the effectiveness of intervention
programs for IPV perpetrators. One of these motivational strategies is goal
setting. The aim of this study was to analyze and categorize the self-determined
goals (n = 204) of 227 male participants attending an intervention program for IPV
perpetrators. Findings of the thematic analysis suggested three levels of analysis:
4 core categories, 12 categories, and 35 codes. The four core categories were
“interpersonal relationships” (39.7%), “personal resources for daily life” (29.3%),
“coping strategies” (27.8%), and “motivation to change” (3.2%). Identifying the main
categories of self-determined goals of IPV perpetrators could guide professionals to
tailor the intervention to participants’ specific needs and implement evidence-based
strategies to strengthen goal attainment and improve treatment outcomes.
1University of Valencia, Spain
*These authors share first authorship.
Corresponding Author:
Faraj A. Santirso, Department of Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Avda.
Blasco Ibáñez, 21, Valencia, 46010, Spain.
Email: faraj.santirso@uv.es
1170120IJOXXX10.1177/0306624X231170120International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative CriminologyRoldán-Pardo et al.
research-article2023
1384 International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 67(13-14)
Keywords
intimate partner violence perpetrators, intervention program for IPV perpetrators,
motivational strategies, self-determined goals, thematic analysis
Introduction
Intimate partner violence (IPV) has been acknowledged as a public health, social pol-
icy, and human rights concern of epidemic proportions that affects women, their chil-
dren, and society as a whole (World Health Organization, 2021). As a way to reduce
IPV, intervention programs for IPV perpetrators have been widely implemented to
reduce IPV perpetration and reoffending (Babcock et al., 2004, 2016; Eckhardt et al.,
2013). Several challenges exist that hinder the effectiveness of these interventions,
including high dropout rates, limited treatment engagement, low motivation for
change, minimization of responsibility, and victim-blaming (Jewell & Wormith, 2010;
Lila et al., 2014, 2019; Martín-Fernández et al., 2018; Olver et al., 2011).
To overcome these challenges, intervention programs for IPV perpetrators are
increasingly integrating evidence-based motivational approaches, such as motiva-
tional interviewing, the Good Lives Model, and strength-based approaches (Crane &
Eckhardt, 2013; Musser et al., 2008; Santirso, Gilchrist, et al., 2020). The incorpora-
tion of these motivational approaches has shown promising results in increasing the
effectiveness of intervention programs for IPV perpetrators (Babcock et al., 2016;
Santirso, Gilchrist, et al., 2020; Wilson et al., 2021). Intervention programs for IPV
perpetrators which incorporated motivational strategies showed lower dropout rates,
increased treatment engagement, and longer-term intervention effects (Lila et al.,
2018; Santirso, Gilchrist, et al., 2020).
One of the motivational strategies used in intervention programs for IPV perpetrators
is goal setting. A goal is defined as a relevant aim that motivates improved self-perfor-
mance (Lee et al., 2007; Ryan, 1970). Self-determined goals can be seen as a “textbook”
guide of desired states or situations that individuals strive to achieve or avoid (Lee et al.,
2014; Ward, 2002). They are based on personal needs for autonomy, competence, and
relatedness (Deci & Ryan, 2000), and they lead to meaningful and satisfactory lives that
are not conducive to perpetrating IPV (Langlands et al., 2009; Lila et al., 2018). Findings
of empirical studies of intervention programs for IPV perpetrators showed that goal set-
ting is associated with positive treatment outcomes, such as decreased recidivism (Lee
et al., 2007), increased awareness (Curwood et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2003), an accom-
plishment of attitudinal changes and skills development (Lee et al., 2014; Murphy &
Meis, 2008), and increased treatment engagement and motivation for change (Lee et al.,
2007; Stewart & Slavin-Stewart, 2013). Research suggests that goal setting may benefit
the process of change in treatment for male IPV perpetrators (Bolton et al., 2016; Bowen
et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2007). In the context of intervention programs for IPV perpetra-
tors, Bolton et al. (2016) and Bowen et al. (2018) suggest that these goals should be (1)
personally meaningful to the participant, (2) stated as small steps to be achieved in pro-
cess form, (3) new and relevant, (4) clear, specific and with indicators of success, (5)

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT