Seeing the forest for the trees: Institutional environment impacts on reimbursement processes and healthcare operations

Date01 November 2016
Published date01 November 2016
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2016.09.001
Seeing the forest for the trees: Institutional environment impacts on
reimbursement processes and healthcare operations
Seung Jun Lee
a
, James D. Abbey
b
,
*
, Gregory R. Heim
b
, Duane C. Abbey
c
a
School of Global Innovation &Leadership, Lucas College and Graduate School of Business, San Jos
e State University, One Washington Square, San Jose, CA
95192-0164, United States
b
Department of Information &Operations Management, Mays Business School at Texas A&M University, 320 Wehner Building j4217 TAMU, College
Station, TX 77843-4217, United States
c
Abbey &Abbey Consultants, Inc., P.O. Box 2330, Ames, IA 50010-2330, United States
article info
Article history:
Received 24 February 2015
Received in revised form
6 August 2016
Accepted 5 September 2016
Available online 18 September2016
Accepted by: Mikko Ketokivi
Keywords:
Healthcare
Coding
Billing
Payment
Reimbursement
Institutional environment
abstract
Healthcare reimbursement processes perform an annual multi-trillion dollar task to remunerate
healthcare organizations, physicians, and patients. Healthcare reimbursement entails coding, billing, and
payment processes based on care provided to patients. As this research note highlig hts, though often
implicitly assumed to be independent of care delivery processes, reimbursement processes are distinctly
connected to the efcacy of care delivery. Prior research tends to examine neither antecedents nor
consequences of healthcare reimbursement processes and their operational implications, even though
these issues can lead to unproductive externalities affecting healthcare systems and patients. Most extant
literature tends to focus on medical task environments, with far less attention given to how institutional
environment structures reimbursement and thus drives stakeholder incentives and behaviors. Because of
a wide diversity of institutional environments, reimbursement processes differ on a nation-by-nation
basis, and within nations on a state, province, city, or even within-city basis. The varied and complex
reimbursement processes drive divergent stakeholder incentives, varying use of healthcare protocols and
processes, and differing patient outcomes. Even within a single reimbursement regime, a multitude of
reimbursement policies, required processes, and payer institutions creates operational complexity for
physicians and their professional staff, which ultimately affects patient care delivery processes and
outcomes. The task environment focus of extant healthcare OM research suggests a need to und erstand
institutional environment antecedents, natures, and impacts of reimbursement processes. This research
note illustrates the seemingly simple structural nature of reimbursement processes, yet also reminds
researchers how diverse institutional environments, built to accomplish different healthcare aims, can
lead to similar levels of enormous process complexity. The research note further motivates how such
phenomena may affect research ndings and the quest for operational solution s to healthcare dilemmas.
By focusing on healthcare reimbursement and its operational implications, the note provides useful
insights for continued studies of healthcare operations.
©2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
We really do believe much harder times are coming from a
reimbursement standpoint.-Daniel Morissette, Stanford
Health Care CFO (Ellison, 2015)
1. Introduction
Healthcare reimbursement processes include coding, billing,
and payment processes related to care provided to patients. Though
these processes are known to have massive economic impacts on
national economies and businesses (Baker and Rosnick, 2005; Brill,
2015), the processes also generate many operations management
challenges. Healthcare providers, involved in $3 trillion of annual
nancial ows in the U.S. alone, face salient operating challenges
arising from regulatory and market pressures (World Bank, 2014;
Brill, 2015). As the scope and costs of regulated healthcare tasks
*Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: seungjun.lee@sjsu.edu (S.J. Lee), jabbey@mays.tamu.edu
(J.D. Abbey), gheim@mays.tamu.edu (G.R. Heim), duane@aaciweb.com (D.C. Abbey).
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Operations Management
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jom
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2016.09.001
0272-6963/©2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Journal of Operations Management 47-48 (2016) 71e79

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT