Section 43 Trademark Infringement

LibraryCommercial Law 2007

The Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Trade-Mark Act), 60 Stat. 427, known as the Lanham Act, creates a claim for trademark infringement “when a trademark holder can demonstrate that the use of its trademark by another is likely to confuse consumers as to the source of the product.” Home Box Office, Inc. v. Showtime/The Movie Channel Inc., 832 F.2d 1311, 1314 (2nd Cir. 1987); 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1); see also Hubbard Feeds, Inc. v. Animal Feed Supplement, Inc., 182 F.3d 598, 601 (8th Cir. 1999); ConAgra, Inc. v. George A. Hormel, & Co., 990 F.2d 368, 369 (8th Cir. 1993). The critical issue in an infringement action is whether there is a likelihood of confusion, mistake, or deception between the registered mark and the allegedly infringing mark. See John H. Harland Co. v. Clarke Checks, Inc., 711 F.2d 966, 972 (11th Cir. 1983); Sun-Fun Prods., Inc. v. Suntan Research & Dev. Inc., 656 F.2d 186, 189 (5th Cir. 1981); see also Armstrong Cork Co. v. Armstrong Plastic Covers Co...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT