Section 33.52 Interlocutory Judgment

• Library: Criminal Practice 2012 Forms

[Caption]

Interlocutory Judgment

Now on this _____ day of _________________, 2____, this cause coming on for trial, comes the plaintiff, State of Missouri, by its attorney, ____________________, Prosecuting Attorney of _______________ County, Missouri, and Defendant Gilbert Roe comes by stipulation filed by his attorney ___________________, and Defendants Marjorie L. Doe, Paul Bert Doe, and Lester E. Roe, though having been duly served, did not appear and are in default.

The parties, waiving a jury, submit the cause to the Court upon the Petition herein and the evidence and proof adduced, and the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:

1. Defendant Marjorie L. Doe was personally served with her summons in this case on August 28, 2003, and is in default, having never filed an answer or any other response.

2. Defendant Paul Bert Doe was personally served with his summons in this case on August 28, 2003, and is in default, having never filed an answer or any other response.

3. Defendant Gilbert Roe was personally served with his summons on September 11, 2003, and is represented in this cause by ___________________________.

4. Lester E. Roe was personally served with his summons in this case on December 15, 2003, and is in default, having never filed an answer or any other response.

5. Section 513.607, RSMo Supp. 2011, provides that all property of every kind “used or intended for use in the course of, derived from, or realized through criminal activity is subject to civil forfeiture,” which proceeding may be instituted by the Prosecuting Attorney of...