Section 26 Knowledge of Order or Decree

LibraryRemedies 2006

Proof that the alleged contemnor had actual knowledge of the order or decree is required. Chem. Fireproofing Corp. v. Bronska, 553 S.W.2d 710 (Mo. App. E.D. 1977); R— v. Souder, 305 S.W.2d 888 (Mo. App. S.D. 1957); White v. Held, 269 S.W.2d 125 (Mo. App. E.D. 1954). Such knowledge may be established by circumstantial evidence, but the circumstantial evidence must be “consistent with a hypothesis of guilt and inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence.” State ex rel. O’Brien v. Moreland, 703...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT