Section 25.4 Epithets

LibraryCriminal Practice 2012 Supp

1. (§25.4) Epithets

Epithets are still “ill-advised,” and, if there is no evidentiary basis for an epithet, it can be prejudicial error. State v. Miller, 604 S.W.2d 702 (Mo. App. W.D. 1980).

The courts have permitted referring to the defendant by the following terms:

· A “cold blooded murder[er],” State v. Spencer, 195 S.W.2d 99 (Mo. 1946)

· A “menace,” State v. Benjamin, 309 S.W.2d 602 (Mo. 1958)

· A “dangerous man,” State v. Jones, 227 S.W.2d 713 (Mo. 1950)

· A “drunken killer,” State v. Eison, 271 S.W.2d 571 (Mo. 1954)

· A “vulture,” State v. Hardy, 276 S.W.2d 90 (Mo. banc 1955)

· A “mean punk” and “a vicious man,” State v. Tate, 468 S.W.2d 646 (Mo. 1971)

· A “young punk,” State v. Wallace, 504 S.W.2d 67 (Mo. 1973)

· A “pusher,” State v. Taylor, 508 S.W.2d 506 (Mo. App. E.D. 1974)

· A “professional car thief,” State v. Nichelson, 546 S.W.2d 539 (Mo. App. E.D. 1977)

...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT