Section 23.14 Motive

LibraryCriminal Practice 2012 Supp

2. (§23.14) Motive

Motive is relevant as circumstantial evidence of guilt. State v. Snider, 869 S.W.2d 188, 193–94 (Mo. App. E.D. 1993). When the defendant maintains innocence, evidence of motive or absence of motive is relevant. State v. Hill, 866 S.W.2d 160, 163–64 (Mo. App. S.D. 1993). Trial courts have great latitude in admitting evidence as to the defendant’s motive. State v. Blackman, 875 S.W.2d 122, 139–140 (Mo. App. E.D. 1994); State v. Ottwell, 852 S.W.2d 370, 373 (Mo. App. E.D. 1993). Thus, the state can develop motive even though it involves evidence of other crimes. Id.; State v. Mallett, 732 S.W.2d 527, 534 (Mo. banc 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 933 (1987). Evidence of motive has been allowed to discredit a claim of...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT