Section 13.12 Failure to Produce Witnesses—Adverse Inference

LibraryCivil Trial Practice 2015 Supp

J. (§13.12) Failure to Produce Witnesses—Adverse Inference

A party’s failure to call witnesses more within that party’s control—that is, who are not equally available—and who have knowledge of facts and circumstances vitally affecting the issues in the case, raises a strong presumption that such testimony would have been unfavorable to the party who failed to offer it. Bean v. Riddle, 423 S.W.2d 709 (Mo. 1968); Moore v. St. Louis Pub. Serv. Co., 251 S.W.2d 38 (Mo. 1952); Feese v. Anderson, 648 S.W.2d 638 (Mo. App. S.D. 1983); Lipton Realty, Inc. v. St. Louis Hous. Auth., 705 S.W.2d 565 (Mo. App. E.D. 1986). See also Kampe v. Colom, 906 S.W.2d 796 (Mo. App. W.D. 1995); Anderson v. Wittmeyer, 895 S.W.2d 595 (Mo. App. W.D. 1995); Countryman v. Seymour R-II Sch. Dist., 823 S.W.2d 515 (Mo. App. S.D. 1992).

Of course, the obvious key to the issue is the meaning of the phrase “equally available.”...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT