Section 11.29 Statements of Juveniles

LibraryCriminal Practice 2012 Supp

E. (§11.29) Statements of Juveniles

Juvenile defendants subjected to interrogation are given protection that goes beyond the guidelines set forth in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). This additional protection is derived from three sources:

Interpretations of the statutes of the Juvenile Code

Caselaw

The application of the “totality of the circumstances” test, which considers the “inherent weaknesses” of the defendant, including age

The pertinent provisions of the Juvenile Code are as follows:

After a child is taken into custody as provided in section 211.131, all admissions, confessions, and statements by the child to the juvenile officer and juvenile court personnel and all evidence given in cases under this chapter, as well as all reports and records of the juvenile court, are not lawful or proper evidence against the child and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever in any proceeding, civil or criminal, other than proceedings under this chapter.

Section 211.271.3, RSMo 2000.

When a child is taken into custody with or without warrant for an offense, the child, together with any information concerning him and the personal property found in his possession, shall be taken immediately and directly before the juvenile court or delivered to the juvenile officer or person acting for him.

Section 211.061.1, RSMo 2000.

When a child is taken into custody, the parent, legal custodian or guardian of the child shall be notified as soon as possible.

Section 211.131.2, RSMo 2000.

When a petition has been filed, a child may waive his right to counsel only with the approval of the court.

Section 211.211.8, RSMo 2000.

Additionally, when giving a child the Miranda warnings, the interrogator must warn the child that “he has a right to have a parent, guardian or custodian present during questioning.” Section 211.059.1(3), RSMo Supp. 2004.

Even if a child is charged in juvenile court with what would be a criminal offense if the child were an adult, the juvenile court proceedings are considered civil in nature. This comports with the purpose of the Juvenile Code to facilitate the care, protection, and discipline of the children who come within the juvenile court’s jurisdiction. Section 211.011, RSMo 2000.

In State v. Arbeiter, 408 S.W.2d 26, 30–31 (Mo. 1966), when the juvenile was interrogated in violation of § 211.061, the statements implicating him in a homicide were inadmissible in a later prosecution. A statement a juvenile gave to a juvenile officer was not...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT